• ObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    A reasonable person votes against the enemy after a certian point, even if that means electing a fucking banana. Why did you need to convinced to vote against Trump? Why wasnt that a given? One of you answer us that please

    • BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      A reasonable person understands running the same strategy over and over and expecting different results is literally the definition of insanity.

      But it’s perfectly ok for the DNC to trot out nothing but the status quo for their voters? After over a decade, they can’t promise anything beyond “not fascism” to their voters and the rest of the population?

      And I already answered you: Harris needed to convince voters to vot for her, or against Trump. That’s a politicians job during a campaign, and she failed miserably.

      So now explain to me why the average voter has to keep swallowing a shit sandwich, but the political party that keeps failing using the same failed strategy, why don’t they have to change? Why is it so unreasonable for them to adopt more popular, progressive policies that voters actually want?

      I’ll wait, you can go ahead and explain that.

      • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        People weren’t happy so the DNC booted Biden and put in Harris who is a strong candidate given the situation.

        Still the fickle left wasn’t happy and over ten million voters who voted Biden before wouldn’t turn out for her.

        I wouldn’t blame the democrats for going harder right now to both eat away at the republican’s support and target the people who actually turn out to vote.

        Trump got less votes in 2024 than 2020.