silence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 2 days agoWe Study Climate Change. We Can’t Explain What We’re Seeing.www.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square4fedilinkarrow-up150arrow-down10cross-posted to: nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz
arrow-up150arrow-down1external-linkWe Study Climate Change. We Can’t Explain What We’re Seeing.www.nytimes.comsilence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square4fedilinkcross-posted to: nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz
minus-squareRhaedas@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up10·2 days agoThey aren’t going to abolish NOAA. Just…cut out stuff that goes against what they want to hear. I guess it’s the same thing in the end.
minus-squaredisguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·2 days agoThey won’t need to abolish it. They plan to replace the 11,000 hired contractors with loyalists, just like every other agency.
They aren’t going to abolish NOAA. Just…cut out stuff that goes against what they want to hear. I guess it’s the same thing in the end.
They won’t need to abolish it. They plan to replace the 11,000 hired contractors with loyalists, just like every other agency.