• Gsus4@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Actually, I was talking about the way authoritarians manipulate history by denying people access to information, but you can shoehorn whatever you want, sure, lots of other people seem to have done so too looking at the downvotes, lol. The truth is what you can prove, not reality. There is proof of the Holocaust, but that is what we are aware of. Lots of other things happening at the time, like the Crimean Tatars goes unnoticed until focus moves there.

    • orrk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was talking about the way authoritarians manipulate history

      translated to normal: “I was talking about the way (((they))) manipulate history”

      • PugJesus@kbin.socialM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think you’re being unfair - I legitimately think they’re talking in the abstract here.

        • orrk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean ya, sure, I agree they are referring to it in the abstract, but does simply referring to it in the abstract really change the meaning of what he is saying? other than, it allows for one to basically offhand discredit reality and atrocities by insinuating that some shadowy “they” is controlling the global narrative.

          • PugJesus@kbin.socialM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, I mean, I think they’re talking about narratives in the abstract. There was a great deal of debate about this in the early 90s, over the role of historians in creating narratives.