• 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The only real difference I can think of is that Ubuntu’s installer is actually really nice and had the dual boot install option, which I don’t think any other distro has.

    • butre@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      most distros that aren’t like slackware/gentoo/arch/etc. install with calamares these days, it handles dual boot configs simply and without issue. even doing like debian netinst, I don’t remember it having any trouble

      • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        In terms of ease of use, no. They’re capable, but in Ubuntu it’s literally as easy as choosing how much space do you want to leave for Windows and Ubuntu, then it handles all the partitioning for you.

        • butre@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          it’s been years since I bothered with windows I’ll admit, but I’m fairly certain calamares handles it all for you too