• Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s really useful for act 1 at least, where most casters have one spell, and it’s called “miss”.

      • CoderKat@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Casters often feel at a massive disadvantage for casual fights. For a boss fight, casters are often the strongest, since you’ll blow all your spell slots. But for smaller fights, you want to preserve your spell slots and cantrips simply cannot keep up with martials. I mean, a single attack roll for a spell cantrip vs getting 2-3 attack roles that also do more damage total? Heck, my strongest martials can usually do at least double the damage of a spell caster’s cantrips.

        Though at the same time, when I can blow the spell slot, no martial can outdo the AoE damage of reliable ol’ fireball or the likes. Just I can’t justify using my spell slots on a small number of weak enemies.

        • troglodytis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          BG3 saves the day for low level casters by making rest and spell prep such a non-issue. Use it all. Rest rest and rest.

        • FireTower@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I agree with this mostly but I’ve got to add, I’ll give up a spell slot for magic missile on a few low hp enemies any day of the week. Being able to get 3 guaranteed kills if your enemies are low enough hp and spread out is actually really nice.

        • Bassman1805@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Blade Pact Warlock Supremacy!

          Wait, we only get 2 atracks per turn even at max level?

          Sigh. Dwarf fighter it is.

      • Odo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Relatable, but we really need a more elegant solution to vertical vs horizontal videos. I just measured, and that little square of video only used 15% of my screen.