Injury can’t be buy

  • No-Habit988@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Never seen so many complaints about some rough defending. Especially by an 80m player facing actual amateurs. You’d think they’d broken both of his legs

    • Pek-Man@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Especially by an 80m player facing actual amateurs

      Lol, it’s very telling that you can’t see how that only makes it fucking worse. It’s his livelihood, his job, that they were deliberately trying to sabotage by injuring him. They, on the other hand, have very little at stake.

    • DHillMU7@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Defending implies an attempt to play the ball. Driving a knee into someone’s back with zero attempt to play the ball and a team threatening him with aiming for his knees isn’t defending.

    • Duffer44@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you didn’t watch the match, what is even the point of your take on it? It wasn’t “rough” defending. They literally talked about wanting to injure him on the pitch among themselves in Italian.

    • Studwik@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Both Højlund and Kjær speak italian, and they could hear the SM defenders say that they were going to “smash Højlund” and “go for his knees”.

      • No-Habit988@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Have you ever played football at any level? Defenders say this shit all the time and Højlund was fine after the game.