Jesus died at 33, so that can’t get returned in the query response lol

  • V0lD@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Okay, since you’re starting to throw insults via this angle, let’s try to make my case via a different route

    Do you think the db is storing your age as an int or as a float? We know from the given information that it is stored as a singular number

    So, I’m assuming it’s as an int, which means that until you’re 26, you’re still 25. If you’re 25 and 11 months, that’s still 25 years old, and stored as such. The strict inequality should therefore not put it in the range 25 < X < 30

    • schmidtster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If it’s a singular number and not a rounded number. Which we could also assume here…. The number 25 would always be between 25 and 30, if you’re using rounded numbers, there is a possibility that 25 wouldn’t be between 25 and 30 since you would need to account for 24.5 and greater numbers rounded to it.

      And with age, you never round up. So according to these well established rules over time. What could it be other than included in “between 25-30” unless it’s not age or a rounded number which you don’t do for age?

      • V0lD@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The number 25 would always be between 25 and 30

        Okay, wait, what do you think the word “between” means?

          • V0lD@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t. This is the crux of the argument

            The integer 25 does not lie in the open interval (25,30). And someone with at least 25 years on him but not yet 26 has an integer age of 25.

            Again, we’re no working with the normal Euclidean topology here, but with the Euclidean topology projected on the integers

            • schmidtster@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s a whole lot of words for, “I was caught contradicting and lying and now am now talking out of my ass”

              The crux of the argument was explained using all possible outcomes, and you still can’t comprehend it. It’s not an integer it’s age, if you’ve stored it as an integer, you’ve done fucked up in every way possible.

              • V0lD@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                You accused me of not talking in good faith before, but I’m not the one throwing insults.

                Since you seem unwilling to discuss this any further, I’ll halt the conversation too