• 0 Posts
  • 39 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: October 31st, 2023

help-circle
  • When placing the remote mesh point, you don’t want it at the far point where you need the wifi, you want it closer to the base mesh so that it gets a good signal from the base and also so the item that needs wifi gets a good signal from the mesh point. The way you describe it makes me wonder if some placement change could help.

    Unless you’re willing to run ethernet - which would be the optimum choice - you might consider a better mesh system. If so, I would do another post on the sub, and title it “looking for replacement mesh for [your mesh model]”.



  • If you have coax in the house, you could leverage MoCA as an ethernet replacement - next best thing to ethernet. Powerline as mentioned, but it can work great, work poorly, or not at all. The only way to know is to try it out and return if it doesn’t for work you.

    You don’t say what the existing router is, so it’s hard to know whether a better router could help or not - sometimes that’s all you need. A mesh router and satellite might help in terms of signal, if properly placed. Best to be directly connected from your console to the router rather than via a mesh satellite, if you can do it.


  • Ridiculously reliable is how I describe my UniFi setup - I’ve been running it since 2019 and I could not be happier with it. Updating to a UDM Pro next week from a USG-Pro-4/Cloud Key Gen2+.

    I dragged my feet on updates, there were issues a few years ago. However, each update went fine for all devices when I was pushed along, so I’ve gained confidence in them and have been impressed with the improvements in things. I am a former sysadmin and didn’t want to have to have my old job as a new hobby and so far, so good.



  • Hard to know which one would bring you instant relief.

    I would move out on #2 in terms of getting some wiring around. If you’re adding cable, do ethernet (unless you have a need for the coax for some reason). Ultimately, to improve your network in general, you want to wire around the house and provide ethernet to devices that can use it (saving the wifi bandwidth for those that can’t, and convenience items). Also, you can add wifi APs (access points) to improve your wifi coverage for the devices that use it.

    1. Not yet - do your cable planning and upgrades - or at least integrate that planning when buying hardware.

    2. Yes. It’s a good idea for separation if needed, but still a good idea if they are colocated.

    3. Ethernet. Do ethernet. No extenders, you want access points. They will perform better in general and often have more capacity for number of devices they can each support.

    4. No mesh. Mesh is for people who can’t or won’t wire ethernet. Mesh is wirelessly uplinking access points, so it’s wifi over wifi. Ethernet (or MoCA, which leverages coax into near-ethernet speeds) is far preferable. Mesh is not a better network, it’s just for getting around wiring things.

    5. If you are not confident in your ability to crimp the coax, you could have someone with proper tools and connectors re-do it.


  • Technically, a router is just the interface that creates your network and connects to your ISP’s network. Typical consumer “routers” are really a router, switch, and AP in one box (as are the UDR and UDM.)

    You can add an AP to your network, so you could be using the one built into the existing router and an additional AP to provide more wifi coverage. Ubiquiti’s UniFi gives you the ability to easily add network components via the unified interface, part of the benefit of their ecosystem. ( As does Omada and Asus’ AI Mesh, and others also allow intelligent management.)


  • With regard to 6E and “longest lasting” - wifi 7 is coming. If you aren’t going to really use the 6E band capability (you need compatible clients) I would avoid the extra cost of 6E at this point. In 2-3 years there will be more choice and more wifi 7 device availability.

    I also think a UDR or UDM would be a good choice for your situation. The UDR is a bit slower simply because of processing power (hence the lower price) when using cameras and the app that runs them.


  • Two cables to each location, even if you do conduit. If you have an office planned, multiple network outlets in the room. Ethernet to the AV/TV locations, garage(s), patio/deck, front driveway, and any place you might want to surveil from (like - backyard looking towards the structure, for instance). Plan to wire everything that can be wired, leave wifi for the convenience and IoT stuff. Do a good study on locations for APs for optimal coverage.




  • Generally, external antennas don’t do a great job as add-ons. At the frequencies used, the signal loss in cables can be significant, especially the received signal (vs. the transmitted one). Also, the antennas on the box work in conjunction with each other (things like diversity reception). The devices are engineered for the antennas provided, and you can’t just peel off one of four without affecting the function of the wifi transceiver.

    u/Somhlth has the right idea here - put the actual AP out there somewhere (protect from weather), or add an actual outdoor AP like from TP-Link.


  • For what its worth - I got started in UniFi when my Asus’ wifi got flaky. I turned off the radio and added a UniFi AP (AC-Lite). Problem solved. I just had the AP sitting on top of a bookcase, not even noticeable. It covered my then house at 1700 sq ft. Maybe just adding an AP could improve your situation for now. (In a different house now, I have a complete UniFi setup - including that AC-Lite, which is doing fine!)

    You could take a look at the UniFi Dream Router (wifi 6 4x4 MiMo AP built in) or Dream Machine (wifi 5 4x4 MiMo built in) - both are all-in-ones.








  • Yeah, it’s confusing out there with all the BS marketing and gimmicks to get you to “blanket your house in warm comforting wifi”.

    If you’re looking for something to “grow into”, you absolutely want either Ubiquiti UniFi or TP-Link Omada. The big benefit is, of course, is the unified management of all components. It makes things like VLANs easy. You have one pane of glass that manages all your components centrally. I have a UniFi setup with a gateway, controller, seven switches, four APs and four cameras and manage the whole thing with one interface. I literally can plug in a new UniFi device and the controller will detect it. I click a button and it’s a part of my network. If it’s an AP, the settings are automatically populated to it. You can group APs and apply different settings to those groups as well.

    Neither wifi 6E or 7 will benefit you unless you have clients that support it. Both of the above brands have wifi 6 APs which will be fine until wifi 7 gains traction in 2 or 3 years and then you can consider whether you want to upgrade one or more access points (indeed, I have only one AX AP, the others are just AC which is fine for 95% of my devices.) Flexibility is another big deal with the SDNs (software defined networks, both UniFi and Omada) Also, plain access points are purpose built for one thing- be an AP. The mesh points have to manage not only client traffic but also traffic between the base and themselves.

    Mesh is just wirelessly uplinking APs and is for people who can’t or won’t wire their network. You will get much better performance from a wired system every day of the week. The consumer manufacturers have marketed mesh like it’s The Next Big Thing, and it’s not. There’s lots of hay made about “seamless roaming” like it’s exclusive to mesh. Wifi manages roaming all by itself and the so-called seamless stuff is nothing more than some already defined tech (802.11k/r/v) that assists wifi clients. Mesh can sometimes do it since it’s centrally managed, but so does UniFi (and I think TP-Link does as well.)