Jorgelino328

Here’s how that would go:

“Hey, Alice, what’s up, it’s Mike from the party!”

“Alice? What do you mean alice, she di…”

[Thinking] “shit, that’s a man’s voice. Must be her boyfriend.”
hangs up

Your argument was that Christianity and Islam preach that we’re all equal. I am saying that is not true (Or actually, that it preaches that while simultaneously preaching the opposite). It simply lacks one layer of inequality.

You can use quotation marks to filter only results that have a certain word or phrase in it, rather than related content.

Right. Christianity and Islam say we’re all equal…

Unless of course, you’re lgbtq, or a woman, or an atheist, or a member of another religion, or anyone they don’t like really.

But other than that we’re all equal.

It would have to be a different panel but you could draw it as the whole screen being black except of the character and the destination.

Shouldn’t the path that maximizes time have its line go through literally everywhere in the globe rather than just going around it once?

I try to think of it in terms of how it would go at a D&D session.

For example, if i roll perception well, seeing a tile is trapped, and tell the DM i avoid it, he’s not going to have some NPC trigger it because i forgot to tell them to stop following me, so i feel justified in reloading a save in that case.

Not sure if the joke is the guy not recognizing Stephen King, or him not knowing his own books cause he was high out of his mind when he wrote them.

Do you mean, leave her… en paz? (in peace)

Why didn’t we do his from the beginning instead of the blackout then? Seems way easier than keeping all of these subs private indefinitely.