• 0 Posts
  • 655 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 23rd, 2023

help-circle



  • So are the old, children, and anyone not within the “best for capitalism” bell curve (which I just made up, but you get the sentiment).

    That’s basically a pro-capitalist argument used to justify a system which should not exist in the first place.
    If we’re discussing our thoughts of what should be, then I believe healthcare should be a function of government and a human right.


  • that happiness should not come at the others’ expense.

    It’s probably a failure of imagination, but I’ve never really understood this part of anti-acceptance sentiment.
    Any valid criticisms I’ve seen largely come down to regular old accessibility failures or capitalism making people believe airline seats should be miserably cramped.

    What is the trade off, in a real, not hypothetical sense?






  • Monument@lemmy.sdf.orgtoMemes@lemmy.mlToxicity
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 days ago

    That’s very fair, indeed.

    Perhaps awareness of one will spark awareness of the other. I suppose my concern is that plasticisers are sort of a ‘hidden’ risk, for the most part. They’re used in nearly every food packaging (and prep, such as hoses) that isn’t contained in glass, or served up in its own peel.


  • Monument@lemmy.sdf.orgtoMemes@lemmy.mlToxicity
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    9 days ago

    Microplastics are terrifying and all that, but I’m sort of more worried about plasticisers like BPA, BPF, BPS and the rest of the alphabet of BP-whatever’s that was created and brought into use after the dangers of BPA were realized.

    Just a heads up - if something plastic says it’s BPA-free, it probably uses a different bisphenol compound that is less studied than BPA. And is likely as toxic (or even more toxic)!

    But nobody ever talks about those, because science words.






  • One of the things I’m wondering about is whether Helene chopped up the water and caused some overturning/cooling that may lower surface temps.

    And if it did (or did so to a meaningful degree), is that helping to temper Milton before it makes landfall?

    And I guess I’m commenting here because you seemed so confident. (Maybe you’re just making it up as you go along, too. Who knows?!)


  • Monument@lemmy.sdf.orgtoLemmy Be Wholesome@lemmy.worldRule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    Mind you, 4.1% reflects only people who are unemployed that have looked for a job within the last 4 weeks.

    Let’s add in people who want a job, have looked for work in the last year, but haven’t looked in the last 4 weeks. And let us also add in people who want a job, but have a job market-related reason for not looking for one. The rate is now 5%. Still not bad.

    Alrighty. What about adding in people who are working part time, but would rather work full time? The under-employed, if you will. Oh. Now it’s 7.7%

    Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

    Cryin’ all the way to the bread line.

    And besides none of the above discusses that the unemployment rate is non-comprehensive and does not measure the quality of the jobs - rather, how well those jobs pay people compared to CPI.