香港,中国

  • 17 Posts
  • 302 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: March 13th, 2022

help-circle
  • It just so happens that under Russian rule, Russian rulers will be making profit instead of Ukrainian rulers.

    I think we’re missing a couple of nuances here, no? Although it’s a stretch to call them nuance. The way Ukrainian rulers have been making money has been through privatization. And because there’s so much privatization we need to look at who owns Ukraine’s economy. It’s only escalated since Russia invaded, with national assets being sold off to foreign private sectors so cheaply that one has to wonder why they did it when the gains are a drop in the bucket compared to the direct aid they’ve been getting from Western public sectors.

    If Ukraine emerges from this conflict with its own sovereignty, it’ll be sovereignty over a flag, a presidential palace and a state framework that protects foreign companies’ investments from hungry Ukrainians.




  • The Democrats knew this was going to happen. There’s no way they couldn’t. And I don’t mean Democrat supporters, many of whom were vehement that Biden was fine like so many anecdotes in this thread recount. I mean the Democrat leadership, who manage his campaign and more than likely manage his presidency. Unlike the public, they have access to him. They have his medical records, the reports of his doctors and caregivers, everything. There’s no way they didn’t know this would happen if he debated.

    They might start seeding support for a different candidate into their supporter’s discourse after this, but they will have been planning for this outcome long ago. And when a left-leaning (left from a US Overton window) news platform hosts a debate that shows him up that badly and then publishes commentary like this, you have to wonder if that caused friction with the DNC or if they assented to it.

    As the party starts singling out a replacement, the question I hope people start asking is why they didn’t replace Biden earlier? Did they need to wait until the urgency of imminent elections made their new candidate more palatable? And if they don’t replace Biden, why are they letting Trump win?












  • Yeah it’s called the National Security Law. When that went into effect it was a clear message to the liberals to shut the fuck up or fuck the fuck off. The ones that have stayed (because they wanted to keep getting the kind of paychecks that they could only dream about back home) are all just quietly ‘complaining’ in private (I know this first-hand because a lot of them think I’m one of them) but keep their mouths shut in public.





  • Holy shit that sounds dystopian as fuck.

    Liberals usually pretend they’re acting from a place of objective neutrality and measured, scholarly interpretation of historical facts when they parrot their narrative. But it sounds like this professor’s really showing their bias, especially with the way they disparaged Mike Davis’ appearance. That fuckhead of a professor is probably enjoying having you sit through that echo chamber of insipid liberal bullshit.

    I’d reject any attempt by that professor to claim that they’re open to all ideas. He very clearly isn’t. If I were in your position and needed to ‘pass’ that farce of a history education, I’d probably go with malicious compliance. Cry performative crocodile tears and loudly lament about how the West is in an unsalvagable decline while the dirty commies and upstart former colonies are building a new world without the white man’s permission or involvement. The Western take on history is cope, and you can wipe out any sense of triumph of ideology your professor might be deluding himself into by reminding him that he’s getting a front row seat to the end of capitalism and liberalism, just as Marx (everybody guess what he looks like! hur hur) predicted.