Status: Libertarian Communist; Agnostic Atheist; Vegan

Pronouns: They/Them

Sexuality: Asexual

Likes: Libertarian Communism; Anthropology; Psychology; Atheism; Veganism; Cats

Dislikes: Capitalism/any form of private ownership of the means of production; The state and all other unjust hierarchies

#cats #catsofmastodon #communism #anticapitalism

YouTube Channel: https://youtube.com/@AnarCat?si=FMLL2U6PuSvSLhjC

  • 0 Posts
  • 37 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: September 8th, 2023

help-circle
  • @Cowbee
    I’m not able to take anything you say seriously. First, you claim that individuals having authority over others isn’t an accumulation of power even though a person with authority would have to have power over others to have authority over them, and then you claim that communism is compatible with inequality, which is the most absurd thing I’ve ever heard a communist claim. You sound like a revisionist.


  • @Cowbee
    Hierarchy is the accumulation of power in the hands of a select minority of people. Even if there are safeguards to prevent too much power going to the top there will still always be an accumulation of power at the top of the hierarchy, thereby creating an inequality of power amongst the population. The only way to not have inequality of any kind is to get rid of hierarchy.


  • @Cowbee
    Hierarchy is a bad thing as it perpetuates inequality and oppression by allowing certain people to have more power than others. Not only would a system where power is decentralized be better in terms of eliminating inequality and oppression, but such a system would be more in line with communism’s goal of creating a classless society.




  • @Cowbee
    I haven’t based a single thing on idealism or “vibes”. I examined the historical events and inferred a logical conclusion based on the facts, and the facts are that ideological unity was indeed lacking and necessary among the Spanish Revolutionaries, but nothing suggests that their unity had to be based on hierarchy and centralized planning, nor does anything suggest that the CNT-FIA’s methods of the organization were inferior simply because they lost because other traditionally…



  • C Ⓐ T@mastodon.socialtoMemes@lemmy.mlKnow the difference.
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    @Cowbee
    …Generalitat. However, the relationship between the anarchists and the Republican government was complex and often strained. The anarchists sought to maintain their autonomy and implement their vision of a decentralized, self-managed society, which sometimes clashed with the goals and methods of the Republican authorities. There were instances of collaboration, such as the participation of anarchists in the government and the militia forces, but there were also conflicts and…


  • C Ⓐ T@mastodon.socialtoMemes@lemmy.mlKnow the difference.
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    @Cowbee
    But they didn’t hold their ideals over their practicableness, and in fact that may have been the reason why they were ultimately defeated. During the Spanish Civil War, the(CNT) and (FAI) were part of the broader Republican side, which included various leftist and anti-fascist groups. While the anarchists were initially wary of collaborating with the Republican government, they did participate in the anti-fascist coalition and the Republican government in Catalonia, known as the…


  • C Ⓐ T@mastodon.socialtoMemes@lemmy.mlKnow the difference.
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    @Cowbee
    …political turmoil and counterrevolutionary forces. It’s not correct to conclude that the Catalonian anarchist were defeated simply because their military was decentralized and that hierarchical organization is superior to non-hierarchical organization simply from this very narrow view of the conflict.


  • C Ⓐ T@mastodon.socialtoMemes@lemmy.mlKnow the difference.
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    @Cowbee
    I know that the strength of workers’ movements resides in unity, not individualism. Libertarian Communism, or at least Platformism, is an ideology of ideological unity first and any individualism is within the context of the greater working-class movement. It’s also important to note that the Catalonian anarchists were defeated for various reasons, including external military pressure, internal divisions, and the challenges of implementing radical social change amidst broader…


  • C Ⓐ T@mastodon.socialtoMemes@lemmy.mlKnow the difference.
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    @Cowbee
    Libertarian Communism can be practical at a scale required to defend a revolution from foreign defenders due to its emphasis on decentralized, community-based defense strategies that empower individuals to protect their communities collectively, which in turn creates a strong sense of solidarity and resilience against external threats.



  • C Ⓐ T@mastodon.socialtoMemes@lemmy.mlKnow the difference.
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    @Cowbee
    A military being decentralized doesn’t mean that it won’t be fully unified. A decentralized military doesn’t imply disorganization; rather, it allows for localized decision-making while still creating a cohesive unity through collective goals and voluntary cooperation.

    The abolition of money would still be possible even with threats of invasion or outright invasions by capitalist governments. In fact, removing the incentive for profit-seeking and resource exploitation inherent in…



  • C Ⓐ T@mastodon.socialtoMemes@lemmy.mlKnow the difference.
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    @Cowbee
    Libertarian Communism and Anarcho-Communism are just different titles for the same ideology.

    I disagree that communism has to be globally achieved and can’t be achieved in one country. If a country can create a strong enough decentralized military and has access to the necessary resources for their survival then communism can be achieved in one country.

    As I’ve previously stated, Libertarian Communism hasn’t been given a chance to be properly implemented, mostly due to the…




  • C Ⓐ T@mastodon.socialtoMemes@lemmy.mlKnow the difference.
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    @Cowbee
    Libertarian Communism doesn’t advocate for a limited government, but for the complete absence of the government, rejecting the idea of a centralized authority altogether, seeking to create a society based on voluntary cooperation and collective ownership of resources. In my criticisms, I’m not just referring to the USSR, but to all of the attempts at authoritarian communism and how most of them collapsed, and how the only remaining 5 still have not achieved communism.