OpenShot. But that’s a video editor and not a conventional video player per se.
OpenShot. But that’s a video editor and not a conventional video player per se.
No need. Fortunately I live in a country with much better worker protection laws. However, in a lot of countries this isn’t the case. As in the USA which is well known for making it difficult for workers to unionize.
Fair point. Although one may say this is fine here for comic purposes.
The same argument could be made about the statement “Gods perfect creation”.
But I’d argue that the suggestion of a creationist god expands the distance to scientific contexts even more while simple speech bubbles are fine due to less ideological conflict potential.
Admittedly, I am also rather allergic to religions, which is why I am having a difficult time with that part of the meme.
Me too. It’s a science meme community after all.
There’s no evidence for gods though.
media player that plays almost everything
What doesn’t it play?
God forbid people have some self expression
They do indeed forbid it.
10 "If you go to battle against your enemies, and the LORD your God delivers them into your control, you may take some prisoners captive. 11 If you see among the prisoners a beautiful woman and you desire her, then you may take her as your wife. 12 Bring her to your house, but shave her head and trim her nails
Deuteronomy 21
Oh man, religions are batshit crazy.
CEO: okay. You’re replacable anyway. Bye.
Totally approrpiate, since they’re terrorists endangering the well-being of everyone and the planet. Wait…
Probably has to be renamed to “ClosedAI” then.
Shit! They found me! crawls away
Rebranding a Markov Chain stapled onto a particularly large graph
Could you elaborate how this applies to various areas of AI in your opinion?
Several models are non-markovian. Then there are also a lot of models and algorithms, where the description as or even comparison to Markov-chains would be incorrect and not suitable.
The level of your argumentation:
Are you a firefighter or a medical doctor? If not, you’re obviously in favour of fires, death and disease.
Why aren’t you donating all of your stuff to homeless people? Or are you happy all those people don’t have a home?
Why aren’t you saving the world already???
You know, demanding change and maybe showing some sort of protest does not mean you need to do those things exactly as you would like to see them, especially if those efforts wouldn’t change anything on the larger scale and rather lead to a bunch of problems in your life.
Reading through the comments here makes one thing apparent again: clear and direct communication about one’s intentions can solve all of these misunderstandings. Being upfront will avoid that unnecessary “are they into me or not” over-analasys or missing such more or less subtle hints at all.
If you’re interested in someone, go for them! Tell them about your interest. It benefits you both. They’ll know, which can help in case they’re interested as well, and you’ll know what to expect whether they’re interested or not. This can also save you a lot of time, heart- and headache.
I feel this. Fell into a similar rabbit hole when I tried to get realtime feedback on the program’s own memory usage, discerning stuff like reserved and actually used virtual memory. Felt like black magic and was ultimately not doable within the expected time constraints without touching the kernel I suppose. Spent too much time on that and had to move on with no other solution than to measure/compute the allocated memory of the largest payload data types.
Where do you get this attitude that everything should be provided to you for free and you’re entitled to it?
From (non-capitalistic) utopic ideas, where humans try to be excellent to each other.
And on the flip side, when you’re not spending much money, you’re being accused of ruining the economy. Especially if you like avocados.
The triangle in the background sky is Pascal’s triangle.
Due to the “being allergic” part this is unfortunately not possible for me. But thanks for trying to provide me with a different perspective.