- 7 Posts
- 1.71K Comments
No, something being objective or not is still someone’s opinion ultimately.
Absolutely incorrect.
And there’s still no right or wrong.
Also incorrect. Right and wrong exist. For example, you’re wrong right now.
So we agree, you were wrong about it “all being subjective opinion.”
Nope.
if they realized the phones then were bricked after getting submerged in water like they used to.
This is not subjective, it’s objectively false.
People are downvoting because the comment is flat-out wrong.
Phones became waterproof before removing headphone jacks became a trend. You’re talking nonsense.
You were able to get to the bootloader with a fucked up bootloader?
2·19 days agoThey’re producers that also DJ.
Instead of being a credit in the liner notes, they took the spotlight and called the singer a feature.
1·22 days agoI don’t appreciate the sarcasm.
Good. That’s the point.
It’s a shaming tactic that you aren’t supposed to enjoy.
1·25 days agoI can’t find anything on that link that shows that it’s been proven to provide adequate nutrition. Where is that information?
Do you have any examples of vegan cat food that has been proven to meet their nutritional requirements?
if the food is palatable and nutritious
That was the claim, no?
That study merely measures palatability. It even says:
Based on these owner-reported behaviours, our results indicate that vegan pet foods are generally at least as palatable to dogs and cats as conventional meat or raw meat diets, and do not compromise their welfare, when other welfare determinants, such as nutritional requirements, are adequately provided.
Please provide the results you found that lead you to the claim you made around palatability and nutrition.
The ones stating that the food is enjoyable.
Where did you find those results?
What are the results of those measurements?
There’s a difference between handing something to someone and leaving it somewhere they happen to be able to take it from.