what the absolute fuck implies relative fucks; it’s not a math term

if you make something with a door and the door needs a manual, your design is shit.

Windows defender works, and it works really well. I haven’t had a virus or used an anti virus (most of which feel like viruses themselves with how intrusive and annoying they have become) in like two decades.

can we have a version that’s less concise? maybe 500 words or so.

all you need is one saying it’s confusing and the other saying “x birds can do it with a pea brain.”

that’s it.

how can I befriend this person because my friends are sick of hearing my shit

I disagree. “It’s ugly” is valid criticism. It has the same value as “needs better/more appealing graphics”. You’re just annoyed it wasn’t sugar coded. In fact I’d argue the former is more valuable than the latter because it doesn’t beat around the bush and more importantly it points to a problem rather than the solution.

As a designer I find that most often customers don’t hit the mark by trying to design the thing themselves, telling me exactly what they want, essentially trying to do my job for me. Hearing the customer’s problems with it to figure out a solution on my own as a designer is better a vast majority of the time.

“I don’t like it” is bad. “I think it looks awful” is better. “I hate the colors” is best. I don’t really care about wording, I care about the information I get.

it’s not though

she was hoping he would “hurt the people he needs to be hurting”

I’m done with calling these people stupid. they’re just bad, hateful people who would rather see the world burn to the ground than see a fellow human enjoy any small benefit whatsoever.

I’m gonna be honest I don’t know what you’re even trying to say, let alone how it relates to my point. I’m talking about “life isn’t fair” usually being a thought terminating cliché and a poor replacement for questioning causes of unfairness. saying “life isn’t fair” in response to any criticism of the system is no more helpful than saying “it is what it is”, which is the quintessential thought terminating cliché.

my point is life isn’t fair could be accurate regarding chronic illness for example, but it isn’t enough to explain the economic burden it brings on you. we might not have the means to prevent a chronic illness, but whatever medical intervention it requires should not be an economic problem for the person. healthcare must—and can—be free.

life isn’t fair, but this isn’t life. it’s the system put in place by people. chalking it up to life not being fair is complicity.

life isn’t fair that someone may be born with a lifelong disease, or they may get one later. can’t do anything about that. economic fairness is something we can change.

BTW I never understood why she became popular, it wasn’t that interesting or funny… but I have nothing against her capitalizing on an opportunity. she was suddenly put in the spotlight but she hasn’t grifted her way there. doesn’t hurt anyone. good for her. my comment isn’t about her but meritocracy in general.

it’s wild how much you can fuck up a car with just a lasso

I don’t think they said people don’t enjoy Harry Potter. they just said it’s bad. and that’s correct. jowling kowling rowling is not just a bad person; she’s a bad writer.

you should post this on lemmy.ml

blender can do anything with a little python

still says “those colours”

memorizing the order of the alphabet would take precious real estate that could instead hold a couple more digits of pi

are you enjoying your healthcare?

because other people are. idk why anyone has trouble understanding that for most users social media is only as good as its population.

there’s a certain kind of privilege in that. like, life must be so good for people to not even bother knowing who’s president.