• XxAbsurdumxX@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I get that Havertz didn’t have an amazing game, but is his rating coloured a bit by the general feeling towards him? I don’t recall him having a bad game at all?

    • loop_1001@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      A lot of the attacks broke down when the ball reached him

      Saka, leo, jorgi all were one touching near the D and the when the ball reached him, burnley nicked it off him

      • _ISD_14@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah that happened a lot

        Also he was really poor at attacking the crosses. Forget the one he missed I’m glad he was there to get the open header there was so many that he just didn’t get near… thankfully Saka did it instead. That’s the kind of assist he needs to be getting if we’re gonna play a 6ft4 player at CAM. He’s never gonna be good in tight areas at that height

      • tiern1@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And like clockwork you’ve 36 comments in the thread all about Havertz

    • _ISD_14@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Raya made a really good save and made a really good defence splitting pass that led to a chance for Trossard but he’s always one of the lower rated players. No one mentions it though

      Havertz gets voted lowest every game but there’s a comment mentioning it everytime and any questioning of Kai ends in loss of downvotes so if anything his contributions are overrated on here not the other way round

    • tipzyt@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Once again who was worse than him this game? Deserved a 6-6.5 again today tbh and if Arteta is taking him off then you know he didnt play well

    • MajesticMongoose@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      He got a pretty average score for a pretty average performance. Someone has to get the worst rating. It’s usually him because he’s usually our worst player.

    • FluxAura@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, if anything, the clueless fans here inflate his score.

      Almost every single game, with very few exceptions, he’s the worst Arsenal player on the pitch.

      • OnlineMarketingBoii@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean if you really want to have the discussion, than you could argue that Saka and Tomiyasu were both worse than Havertz.

        Both played fine, but Havertz was better, and consistantly making good runs and giving good passes.

        But Saka and Tomi are two of the most loved players on this sub, so you won’t hear it. Rightfully so by the way, I love them both as well.

        Thing is, Tomi had a stinker for the goal we conceded. He also didn’t do many other things exceptionelly well. Just a solid game, with one major mistake leading to a goal.

        Saka was quiet all game, but he had an assist, so I guess that evens out.

        Havertz was the reason that our attacking play had some movement towards it. When he got subbed off, the attacking play completely stopped

        • _ISD_14@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This hurt my brain

          I’m not even gonna discuss Saka, who’s been quite rightly called out for being off form recently but he he was good this game

          This is a clear example of this Havertz delusion hypocrisy… you all say people slander Havertz just because he missed a sitter but then you’ll say Tomiyasu for that one instance in the same breath

          Should he have done better? Yes but he had 5 1v1s with Koleosho who is a absolute menace and he had to basically push him over to get past. And even then Tomi has the second lowest score despite dealing with Burnley’s biggest threat. Do I think that means there is a agenda for or against him? No a lot of people actually gave up on Tomi but he’s proven them wrong and Havertz would get the same love if he did too