Is it even possible to remove subjectivity from the officiating? Words like ‘negligible’, ‘deliberate’ and ‘dangerous’ currently do a lot of the heavy lifting in the laws of the game, all of which are quantifiable and open to interpretation.
How could realistic technology, either now or in the future, help the officials with the black/white yes/no in/out decisions?
Constructive discussion only please.
Give managers challenges. The ref makes a call, and they go to VAR only if a manager challenges the call. Managers get 3 challenges per match. If they fail in a challenge they lose a challenge.
Good god no. You’ll be asking for ad breaks next.
When can they make a challenge?