• TooRedditFamous@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “triggers” is doing a lot of heavy lifting here. There is no causal proof, their entire article is based on correlation only

    • beetletoman@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Didn’t read the article but after Rice scored that long range shot he mentioned the Beckham documentary, like he watched it the night before and that inspired him

    • byrgenwerthdropout@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Rice specifically said he attempted his shot because he remembered what Beckham had done. What more proof would you want?

    • laser197518@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not that big a leap to causal inference in this case to be fair. If there’s a logical link between the two, the timing of the ‘treatment’ (documentary) is fairly random (ie it’s not expected to coincide with some other factor that increases long-range shots), and there’s a strong correlation - then there’s a fair that one probably caused the other.