• Meth_Hardy@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I agree with him 100%. It’s why most of the big clubs have bigger squads and players with some good versatility, so help cover multiple positions and allow others to rest. It’s hard on the smaller teams and those with less back up options in their squads. Brighton especially seem to be decimated with injuries whilst also having to factor in a European schedule.

    • Modnal@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, if this keeps up it’s gonna become really important to have a versatile squad and bench. Having players who can only play one position is gonna be a luxury

        • ewankenobi@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Claudio Ranieri was first manager I remember who really started rotating players in the Premiership. The British press nicknamed him the tinkerman because of it

          • kondiar0nk@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Mostly because refs back then were totally cool with allowing teams to just kick them off the park

        • AnnieIWillKnow@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Emma Hayes has been building her Chelsea Women squad in this mould for years too. So many versatile players. Genuinely at least half of the squad can play at least three different positions.

          Erin Cuthbert is her dream. Has played wing back on both flanks, defensive midfield, box-to-box, attacking midfield, both wings.

          A lot is made of CFCW’s depth in terms of numbers, but it’s the versatility that is key - and Hayes has built it that way.

    • Altruistic_Finger669@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It really hurts smaller teams.

      We have so many out injured and we just dont have any depth to cover it up. We had 3 players on the bench yesterday that arent supposed to be close to the first team yet.

    • Mordho@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s why I’m so grateful for Darmian. Without him we’d have been in the mud last year and even this year with Pavard going down and also Dumfries having no backup

    • TechTuna1200@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The bigger clubs usually had more matches. But with addition of conference league, the smaller clubs are beginning to feel the same pain

      • Iordbendtner@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh yeah thats a good point. Here in the eredivisie, with recent coefficient points we have and the conference league, 8th place will already play europa games. Thats the half of the league where it used to be (on the top of my head) first champipns league play offs and second europa league play offs

    • Democracy_Coma@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Europa has always been difficult for teams to handle. You often saw teams qualify and then next season be battling relegation. This isn’t a new phenomenon.

      • Black_XistenZ@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The thing is that the top teams in most leagues are rather stable and can plan on playing international football (and reaping the corresponding revenue and prize money) every season, so that they can afford to build large squads geared toward playing in 3/4 competitions. On the #6 or #7 spots, there is typically far higher volatility from year to year, so these clubs neither have the large squad, nor can they build one based on a one-off participation in international competition.

      • Emma-Royds@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We had 4 different competitions AND a winter World Cup AND a messed up schedule due to the queen’s death last season, it was fucking absurd watching us playing every 3 days

    • Tpickarddev@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Newcastle had 10 squad members (and Elliot Anderson who’s u21 but a key squad member) out against Chelsea, we’ve got 2 games a week till Xmas.

      Even with a decent 25 man squad we’re at bare bones, we named 4 keepers and mostly kids on our bench, and started a 17y/o…

      There’s tough schedules and there’s ridiculous schedules. Next year’s changes to the champions league will add another burden for most clubs competing in that.

      And then the double side of that is if you lose European football you can’t afford to expand your squad to much or have tonnes of players in a non Euro season who just won’t get enough football, so aside from teams who can stay in the top 3 regularly to build a massive squad, it just becomes a massive gamble on injuries.