• cyberpunk007@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yup. It’s a shame the camera lense can’t like rotate or something, phones are much easier to hold vertically.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        The weight is more evenly distributed if you hold it vertically. I still hold it horizontally though.

        • aulin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I don’t know. If I balance the phone on my pinky, with the index finger on top and ring- and middle finger behind, it sits very solidly. My thumb is then free to tap the shutter button.

    • stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I suspect that the sensor has the same dimensions, roughly, as the phone itself. Putting in a square one would probably cost more. Not saying that either way is right, just that that’s probably the reason.

      • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Lenses are circular, so the most cost effective would be a square sensor and square picture. I don’t actually know what modern sensors are though.