• ChemicalPilgrim@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    You ever been in a room where one psychotic person seems to set the whole tone? That’s the world without governments. Anarchy inevitably leads to misery, so let’s come up with the best government we can.

    • janAkali@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      9 months ago

      I thought about this for some time. An anarchy would always collapse into governed state.

      First, imagine the perfect scenario where there no authority and world is just a lot of tiny city-sized communities. It would take just a single bad actor to form a state, start invading neighboring communities and growing in power. In response - other communities would be forced to group into increasingly bigger states to have a chance to oppose influence from bigger/richer states.

      This thought experiment also works if violent takeover is replaced by economic one. Think of cartels and monopolies.

      • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Until they hit another group that is either bigger or stronger and opposed to their way of doing shit. Really no different than how shit works now. Because you certainly wouldn’t be free to murder and steal and rape and enslave or whatnot even in an anarchistic society; people who don’t want you doing that shit would stop you or punish you.

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          And some of those groups would form some ways to manage shit and conduct wars, leading us probably back to governments.

      • purplepuppy@links.hackliberty.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        If you looked up on this subject first, you would know that humans where anarchist for 95% of our existence. There is a good youtube channel “What is politics?” that talks about this. Even today, there are anarchist communities and there where in the past in the modern world, some of them are still going on, some of them where destroyed by outside force, some of them dissolved into state power.

      • ChemicalPilgrim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        No where on earth has anarchy, the places that have it for a few days spontaneously develop order through gangs, warlords, or the intervention of more stable societies

          • Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            9 months ago

            He’s wrong about “a few days”, but that article does not support your case that anarchism works

            • purplepuppy@links.hackliberty.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              It supports the case that it can work. I never made an argument that it always works forever. There are failed attempts, but the cause of their failure is also very important. It is often claimed that somehow, internally, anarchism can not work within a country, while usually the reason anarchisam is destroyed is due to outside invasion or interference. It is simply the case, that anarchist are currently outnumbered, mostly due to opinions like this, that it can not work, so we should try it. If we get a critical mass of enough people, it would be the opposite, states would not be able to survive in a majority anarchistic World, as no one would need to surrender themselves to domination by rulers if they can easily find a better alternative.

        • purplepuppy@links.hackliberty.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Why Somalia? Did you read somewhere they were anarchists or did you just assume that both anarchists and Somalians are savages so that they have to be related somehow.

            • purplepuppy@links.hackliberty.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              No one has a functional state goverment if it’s function is to actually help the people. If states function is to keep people in power, and it is, then they are all functional, including Somalian.

                • purplepuppy@links.hackliberty.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  ? A simple wikipedia search shows there is clearly a president of somalia and there is a goverment that is “federal palamentary constitunoal republic”. Am I missing something? This is the president of somalia.

    • purplepuppy@links.hackliberty.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      This in not true at all. In all anarchist communities, equality is strictly enforced and anyone who tries to get a hold on power is either kicked out or murdered.