• KevonLooney@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Let me get this straight: you think that tribal humans had no rulers and no chiefs? Not only is that not true, it’s like the opposite of true. There were a ton of leaders. If anything, we have fewer leaders now.

    Also, your idea of direct democracy is unworkable without leaders. Who is going to make boring daily decisions like running the Post Office or the US’s official position on someone’s fart in Brussels? Are you trusting the average citizen to vote on that?

    • purplepuppy@links.hackliberty.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      That is simply not true. There is a good video about it, but you can also look it up yourself. The term is egalitarian societies and antrhopologists in last 50 years discovered a bunch of currently living tribes with such structures as well as found much of evidence that before agriculture that was the norm.

      The workers in those post offices are the one that run the post office, bottom up structure. In Spain during anarchist revolution, people were running every part of society in this manner without appointed leaders: factories, banks, military. And they were doing great. Turns out when you don’t have someone at the top leaching all the profits, it ends up pretty profitable for the workers and job becomes a lot easier to do. You can look up anrho-sindicalist war in Spain in 20th century if you don’t believe me.