• mozz@mbin.grits.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    10 months ago

    They could still bomb one of her concerts, or drive a car into fans waiting in line, or some other type of stochastic terrorism. Like a lot terrorism, it’s not necessary to do enough to actually endanger a real high percentage of people, just enough to make anyone who won’t toe the line a little fearful about their safety because of it. A little bit’s enough.

      • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah, maybe so. I hadn’t really realized it before you said this, but historically the violence that helps usher in a fascist takeover is either police violence or big, public, mob-style events – not this sneaking around planting pipe bombs nonsense. I think you may well be right that stochastic terrorism ultimately inspires more resistance then obedience.

        The only analogs I can even think of where a successful fascist takeover was accompanied by terrorism in secret, are the Reichstag fire and the false-flags from Putin’s early days – and both of those inspired a strong reaction against the party that, supposedly, was the one that had perpetrated them.

    • Uranium3006@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      although getting a lot of people who are apolitical but have progressive values to pay attention by bombing their favorite pop star isn’t going to have a favorable outcome for the bombers

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Maybe, but I don’t see how that would end up helping Republicans, so if that does happen, it will be some lone crazy. That’s always a risk.