• jarfil@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    If it helps, the HeLa cell line, very popular in scientific research, comes from an African American woman: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/HeLa

    I guess the reason for using only male cells in this case, might’ve been that if they’re running the test either on a self-replicating cell line, or on a heavily inbred strain of lab mice, where both X chromosomes are supposed to be “practically identical” due to the inbreeding, while one of them gets inactivated in females, then running a test on cells with both X and Y chromosomes, would already include “all there was to see”, with only half the work.

    It’s interesting to see some advances in the understanding of the interaction of two X chromosomes, and how the result is not exactly the same as a single X.

    • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      The HeLa line had its own male-dominated issues, ie: denying her family a right to any money from the use of her genetics … which, once rectified, led to a signing away of any rights for people who have an interest in helping advance scientific and medical knowledge and/or treatments.

      I know this because I was asked to become part of a study, but after reading the contract that clearly stated I (and my family/descendants) would be shut out of any and all financial compensation, I declined.

      While I agree with this if/when a government agency or university developes treatments or cures, I do not agree with it when the info is given freely to for-profit big pharma for them to make trillions from.

      • jarfil@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        her genetics

        Honestly, I don’t see how any person is entitled to the ownership of info that’s shared with 99.9% of humanity, and which neither them nor any of their ancestors had any hand in creating.

        It’s not like anyone has any custom handcrafted genes (yet). Other than a handful new mutations, even a possible copyright of “until death + 75 years” would have expired a long time ago.

        Big pharma copyrighting and patenting the results of their investigations, makes more sense in this case; they’ve at least done something.

        I was asked to become part of a study

        You should have the right to get compensated for participating in a study, or for allowing them to associate the info with your name. I just think the info itself is part of the public domain.

        Like, if you freely leave a fingerprint somewhere public, and someone decides to extract the DNA from that, then proceeds to use it to develop a treatment, cure, bioweapon, clone you, or test the safety of some extra wings genetic augmentation… then good for them.