• shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m a big shooter and liberal gun nut. Not seeing the reason for bump stocks. Now that’s a dangerous argument when talking about a right! I see a lot of libs saying we have to have “reasons” for our various sorts of guns.

    But I don’t get bump stocks. Don’t feel like I’m missing anything from the ban. Thoughts?

    • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Bump stocks just provide the feeling of shooting an automatic, which shouldn’t be restricted imo.

    • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      We are on the same page. I get the lawsuit. You want to keep the government in check but I don’t own one, never would and don’t see a purpose for them.

      I have heard the argument they are for disabled shooters and not to be ableist, but if you can’t safely operate a firearms. You shouldn’t be shooting one.