cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/14100831

"No, seriously. All those things Google couldn’t find anymore? Top of the search pile. Queries that generated pages of spam in Google results? Fucking pristine on Kagi – the right answers, over and ov

  • solrize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I tried Kagi (free 100 query plan) and got about the same results as google/DDG. It’s kind of nice but I couldn’t see subscribing. I hate subscriptions. If they sold access for a flat fee per query (let’s say $5 for 200 queries) I’d buy that, and use a dozen or so queries a month. The rest of the time I’d keep using DDG or occasionally resorting to Google.

    • Kraiden@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      so I’ve just giving it a quick test vs google with the query “open source chromecast alternative”

      the first result for both is a reddit post about NymphCast

      it’s the rest of the results that are interesting though.

      Google has a ycombinator news article about NymphCast and then decends into the usual “17 best chromecast alternatives in 2024” rubbish

      Kagi on the other hand lists the github for NymphCast, and then goes on to list others… mirrorCast, pyCaster, free Cast, an article on using a raspberry pi as a chromecast alternative.

      obviously this is only anecdotal, and very unscientific, but it’s got me interested for sure! Gonna bookmark it and see how it goes

    • sbv@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      I love the idea of paying for a high quality service that I use, but Kagi was significantly worse than Google. I searched for local businesses, programming questions, and general knowledge stuff.

      I’ll try it again in a year or two and see if it works for me.

      • scrion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I switched to Kagi about 6 months back. It is overall better, but at least on par with Google, also as far as tech / programming - related questions go. Whenever I do not get a useful result from Kagi, it literally finds nothing - I then try Google for verification, which also lists absolutely no results. That happened approximately 4 times since I switched.

        Kagi is worse than Google for: reviews, memes, porn, as well as “descriptive” searches, i. e. when trying to describe the desired result using natural language, e. g. “video game character that swallows everything” (I made that up just now for Kirby).

        Kagi’s ability to use lenses and assign weights to sites can make a big difference.

        At first, they didn’t have anonymous payments and an unattractive pricing model, but that has been fixed for a while, otherwise I wouldn’t have switched.

        Overall, I am very satisfied and have absolutely zero plans of ever using Google again.

        • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          I find Kagi results slightly better but the interface is so much nicer and site ranking is great. Mostly though whenever I try using Google it just feels scummy and more obvious than ever that they are trying to shove ad garbage down my brain. I really hope I never need to go back to that again. Agree that crypto payment option for Kagi is clutch, but wish they made that more front and center. Unless you look for it Kagi wants your name, address, and credit card number and all your searches are linked to that. That’s even scummier than Google.

          • darreninthenet@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            They claim that they don’t link/save your search history so although they have your details for payment, technically it’s not linked. If they aren’t lying…

            • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              I also don’t lie and will send you $10,000USD if you send me your credit card number, cell phone number and social. If I happen to accidentally leak your info a few thousand of my friends I will be sure to give you 10% off of a partially reputable ID protection watchdog service. If you trust random corporations that have almost no enforced security oversight, you really should trust this friendly internet stranger as much if not more.

      • solrize@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Then they wouldn’t have tiered plans. Anyway try a $12/year plan with a few queries per month. $60/y adds up a lot faster.

      • solrize@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        6 months ago

        They start at $5/month (https://kagi.com/pricing) and that misses some features. But, I thought they started at $10/month. It may have changed. Anyway, I hate subscriptions and would rather pay by the query. It’s something I’d use once in a while, so I don’t want to keep paying while it idles.

  • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    6 months ago

    Even after all that payola, Google is still absurdly profitable. They have so much money, they were able to do a $80 billion stock buyback. Just a few months later, Google fired 12,000 skilled technical workers. Essentially, Google is saying that they don’t need to spend money on quality, because we’re all locked into using Google search. It’s cheaper to buy the default search box everywhere in the world than it is to make a product that is so good that even if we tried another search engine, we’d still prefer Google.

    It’s been easily 15 years since I thought Google search was good.

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      It was not long after the SSL thing that it became actively garbage. that was what, 2018?

      But yeah, it’s been bad since at least 2012.

        • foggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Google stopped indexing all websites without SSL certificates in July 2018.

          For example, darklyrics.com is a website I and many others grew up using as a resource to understanding lyrics. They’ve stubbornly not gotten an SSL because they transact 0 data beyond band name searches. However, without an SSL, they do not show up in Google search results.

          This is one of literally millions of examples. Some more reasonable than others, but it still was a massive blow to the efficacy of their search.

          • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            27
            ·
            6 months ago

            They’ve stubbornly not gotten an SSL because they transact 0 data beyond band name searches.

            Even if sites do not store user account data, such as passwords, ALL websites, and I mean ALL, handle user data, because merely accessing pages (urls) is user data.

            Stubbornness is not a good reason not to setup SSL. Encryption should always be on, all the time, for everything.

            • Bogasse@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              And it’s not only about user data, it would also expose the website to content spoofing in public wifi, which would for example allow the attacker to inject fishing content in the website.

              SSL encrypts the data you’re sending but it also ensures that you’re communicating only with who you think you are. Without SSL you can’t be confident about any of that.

          • AnActOfCreation@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Hmm I hate Google as much as the next guy and am actively trying to de-Google myself, but I’m not sure I can get behind the outrage here. Certificates are free and easy to obtain with LetsEncrypt, so there’s really no excuse for sites not to accept unencrypted traffic these days. I’m sure Google does lots of things to delist the small guys and promote their big payers, but I don’t think this is one of them.

            • foggy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              6 months ago

              Free certificates expose your subdomains. It’s not more secure if you don’t transact data in a meaningful way such as the example I provided.

              I don’t mean to insinuate that the example I provided is the majority of cases, and in the majority of cases, I do support sites with SSLs being indexed higher than websites without them, but I think the interstitial this website is not secure with the requirement of the advanced click followed by The continue anywaysclick…

              Idk

              Especially in 2018. Like, when we look at it from today’s perspective, it’s very easy to agree. And I do agree. But in 2018, it was not this way. Anyone who was a web developer with a bunch of clients, such as myself, was all the sudden in a very interesting hot seat. Not only did I need to try to upsell my clients, but I needed to convince them that not doing so was quite literally at their peril. It was difficult. And certain cases, it was impossible.

              • unautrenom@jlai.lu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                Expose your subdomains as in having all of them bundled into one certificate?

                AFAIK, you absolutely can request different certs for each subdomain (in fact, that’s what I’ve been doing for a while).

              • AnActOfCreation@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                If your subdomains being public is a security issue then I’d argue something else is wrong. Otherwise you’re using security through obscurity.

                But I appreciate the insight and I see how this was a harder sell back when it happened. Thanks!

                • foggy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Not necessarily. Let’s say you’re a known contributor to a closed source project. You don’t want people knowing you have a locally hosted gitlab instance at gitlab.mydomain.com, for example.

  • Wappen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    What kagi can’t fix is that most forums nowadays don’t exist anymore and moved over to discord which is also a big reason for worse search results.

    For example I had a technical problem with a device of mine, searched for maybe half an hour on Google until I joined a related Discord. Searching there in the support channel and I found the fix for my problem. Would Discord not exist and all the content be queryable by Google I would have found my answer within seconds.

    • Etterra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I don’t understand this trend and i hate that it’s a thing. I also hate Discord.i shouldn’t have to go to a fucking chat room when a forum works better.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Exactly. I would be less mad if it was Matrix, but Matrix search is really slow and not likely to get better.

        Forums make a ton of sense.

        • Cyberflunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          I guess my point was that locking all that knowledge and troubleshooting behind chat interfaces, and obscuring it from search engines makes the internet worse

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    People say Kagi is the same but it’s not. It takes Googles results and filters out the crap and orders results differently, since it’s not trying to get you to go to some commercial site unless you intend to.

    Also the lenses are great.

    • bloopernova@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      6 months ago

      Just being able to exclude certain sites, and reduce the ranking of others, makes search so much better in Kagi.

      I hope they eat Google’s lunch.

    • ChuckEffingNorris@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      This all works until Google cut off API access to a competitor right? Relying partly on a Google API is surely suicidal for a Google Search competitor…

    • jg1i@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      If you don’t do anything except use it like Google, then you only get improved search results. But the other features like lenses, site ranking, URL rewriting, question mark instant answers, and document Q/A make it way more worth it to me.

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think people are just used to being passive now. They dont tinker with the tech and they think its all the same.

        People still use Chrome also because Google kept saying its “faster”, which doesnt even mean anything. Security, privacy and plugin support is what matters.

  • YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 months ago

    Kagi uses Google’s search engine?? I didn’t know that, I thought they’d created their own search engine. If Google blocks Searx, why don’t they block Kagi?

  • NutWrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Google has also gotten lazy and is prioritizing YouTube and Reddit results, instead of webcrawler results.

  • Deebster@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m still very happy with the experience, especially the UX and customisation options, and they’re developing new features fast. Not always successfully at first, e.g. the recent integration of WolframAlpha isn’t entirely a step forward (mostly because they’re not displaying the extra context that WA shows that lets you know when it’s answering the wrong question).

    I think overall most people are very happy, as shown by the frequent recommendations on here (so much so that someone on Lemmy was telling everyone it must be astroturfing).

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I genuinely think Google’s success is its own undoing.

    If everybody had carried on making sites in the same way they did when Google came out, the results would still be good.

    Bit they didn’t. There’s gold in them thar hills, and now SEO and generated bullshit are a way to make money, while Google’s algorithms seem easy to game if you have the resources to do so.

    There’s like a hundred large companies doing this, and if you blocked all their sites in the Google results it’d give results similar to Kagi and other flavour of the month search engines.

  • dep@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I thought Kagi shut down.

    I guess turns out no but if I’m going to pay for search it’s something like Perplexity.

    • darreninthenet@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      You’re accusing Cory Doctorow, the guy who invented the phrase “enshittification”, of making a blog post that’s really an advert…? Really???

      • pop@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        6 months ago

        You’re accusing Cory Doctorow, the guy who invented the phrase “enshittification”

        wow, what a genius. he’s going to solve world hunger next. he’s totally not “milking” nerds who think that word is the best thing since sliced bread.

      • revisable677@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Using SearXNG and DuckDuckGo though, but the piece does read a LOT like an ad. Even the writing style is making me suspicious.

        That’s just my impression, not trying to convince anyone

        • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I mean I really like kagi personally, but will read the article with that in mind