• C Ⓐ T@mastodon.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    @Cowbee
    …disagreements over issues such as the militarization of the militias and the centralization of power. It is completely possible that had the organization of the military been unified in a decentralized way they would not have been defeated.

      • C Ⓐ T@mastodon.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        @Cowbee
        I haven’t based a single thing on idealism or “vibes”. I examined the historical events and inferred a logical conclusion based on the facts, and the facts are that ideological unity was indeed lacking and necessary among the Spanish Revolutionaries, but nothing suggests that their unity had to be based on hierarchy and centralized planning, nor does anything suggest that the CNT-FIA’s methods of the organization were inferior simply because they lost because other traditionally…

        • C Ⓐ T@mastodon.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          @Cowbee
          …hierarchical Spanish military groups also lost to the fascist as well, including the Spanish Marxist backed by the Soviet Union.

            • C Ⓐ T@mastodon.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              @Cowbee
              I never said ideas create reality, however, I do believe that ideas can shape reality through the actions of those who hold those ideas, and I completely agree with the concept of unity through organization, again, never stating the contrary.

              • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                You were idealistically stating that more decentralization would have helped the Anarchists despite material evidence to the contrary. Hierarchy is not a bad thint, unjust hierarchy is.

                • C Ⓐ T@mastodon.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  @Cowbee
                  Hierarchy is a bad thing as it perpetuates inequality and oppression by allowing certain people to have more power than others. Not only would a system where power is decentralized be better in terms of eliminating inequality and oppression, but such a system would be more in line with communism’s goal of creating a classless society.

                  • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    6 months ago
                    1. Hierarchy does not perpetuate inequality, accumulation does. Hierarchy without accumulation and democratically accountable does not perpetuate inequality.

                    2. A decentralized system is not necessarily better at addressing systems of inequality or oppression.

                    3. Decentralized or Centralized makes no difference on creating a classless society.