• Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Because they’ll still exist tomorrow, and the not-having-relatives-danger only increases by supporting the republiQan?

    Is this really that difficult to understand? Using this watershed election as an entry-point to understanding how national politics and foreign relations work (or don’t work) is not only irresponsible, it’s tragic timing. Perfect timing for russia tho. Coincidentally.

    • HuntressHimbo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      Please explain how electing a Republican in 6 months could possibly lower their families chances tomorrow. People not pressuring Biden are telling them don’t worry six months from now you can keep things exactly as bad for your family as they are now, but if you don’t we promise it will get even worse.

      0 opportunity to improve things and a fat chance to make them worse, gee I wonder why they’re not sold. Dead is dead, and we are asking them to give us six months of waiting on the off chance that things would be worse the other way.

      • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I’m going to keep it 💯 with you. Those people are in danger no matter who is in office because Israel is hellbent on commiting genocide, and the United States is strategically aligned with Israel. That isn’t going to change in the immediate term no matter what delusions you or anyone else might have.

        What will get A LOT fucking worse is the future for everyone in the United States that is not part of the oligarchy if Donald Trump gets back in office. There won’t be any chance to make reforms, or change US foreign policy. Anybody that isn’t white, upper class, or a collaborator is going to become a second class citizen.

        So it is time to decide whether you are going to support the party that is going to preserve democracy, or if you are going to doom this country because you want everyone to identify with the suffering of those in Gaza. Either way, Gaza will be in the same position that it is right now. All we are discussing is whether we are going to doom millions more people along with them.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Please explain how electing a Republican in 6 months could possibly lower their families chances tomorrow.

        Certainly. The republiQan party’s ties to the Netanyahu right-wing government are much stronger and more aligned. They also wish to wipe out the population of Palestine and take their land. The Democratic party does not align with those goals.

        That’s how they could lower their familie’s chances. Does that make sense?

        • HuntressHimbo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          No, because you are still failing to address the time aspect. Tomorrow, as in 6 months before the elections.

          • Optional@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Yeah there aren’t any US Presidential elections before November, that I’m aware of anyway.

            I mean after six months is a kind of tomorrow, it’s just not literally tomorrow. Using the election to press a point is not really relevant if we’re not talking about the election though. We’d otherwise just agree.

            • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              They want him to change NOW. Not six months from now after he’s elected. NOW. The electoral threat is meant to cause current changes.

              Threatening to vote against a politician is really the only leverage voters have, and it’s not like they just wait until the week of an election to demand things. “If you don’t do this, I won’t vote for you” is a standard template for demanding action.

              • Optional@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                well, howabout this: we’ll join in all the foot-stomping and loud sighing up until the election. If we can get some concessions through it - great! All for it.

                But we vote Biden in November. Because if you want to drive the election like an asshole and steer it into the ditch so trump gets in - Yeah, no. Not just no, but HELL no.

                How is this even a question? Do you even know what you’re talking about? Have you ever even voted before? Honestly the cavalier attitude to trump getting in is batshit insanity. I hope y’all are just stoned as fuck.

                • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Sure, that seems pretty reasonable to me. It’ll notably look exactly like what you’re exasperated about though. “We’re definitely going to vote for you but we’re angry” is shorthand for “ignore me”.

                  • Optional@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    Only if the whole “representative” part of democracy is a sham and a joke. I don’t think it is.

                    It’s weak, yes, in some ways broken, constantly under siege, in actual existential danger at the present time - but it’s real and the best version we’ve come up with yet in the history of the world. And it wasn’t easy to get here.