• Murdoc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    This feels a bit like the debate over whether a virus is “alive” or not. “But the virus/HTML has DNA/code.” “But it requires another cell/web browser in order to replicate/execute.” etc. 😄

    • fossphi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I really don’t think so.

      For the sake of simplicity, let’s go back to the time when websites were not full of JS and other modern web stuff

      You could in principle just wget the html file from a server and parse/render it without having to run that file. Like I said, it is like a simple markdown file.

      In terms of modern web, a crude analogy would be to look at the output from static site generators. In those, the server essentially doesn’t execute code, hence a lot of cloud providers can host your static sites for free

      • jack@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I agree. Html could also be compared to a config file. Only parsed; it doesn’t provide new instructions (unlike python etc)