It’s still not earning you money to spend electricity because you still have to pay the transfer fee which is around 6 cents / kWh but it’s pretty damn cheap nevertheless, mostly because of the excess in wind energy.

Last winter because of a mistake it dropped down to negative 50 cents / kWh for few hours, averaging negative 20 cents for the entire day. People were literally earning money by spending electricity. Some were running electric heaters outside in the middle of the winter.

    • endofline@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      No, you can’t. You can’t get the same of solar energy in Nordic countries as in Sahara desert. It’s simple, you can’t. Totally different ratio of solar energy per square meter by ranges making it in north Scandinavia virtually unusable

      • randoot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        You see, “Other countries” includes the rest of the world. You build whatever fits the country, be it wind or solar or hydro. I don’t understand what you’re saying.

        • endofline@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          If you don’t know what energy output per meter is, total output and total cost of solar panel ownership, how it varies across geography in relation to equator, the fact there is no cheap way to store it (or you have to use it somehow in that very moment), it means it’s pointless to talk any further. Simple physics. It doesn’t matter though whether if it is solar, wind or water

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        This post is about Finland. If fucking Finland has too much energy, then Sahara has too much energy for sure

        • endofline@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          You missed the point entirely. Finland has little to none solar energy. They have only wind and water energy. Same with most Nordic, Baltic and northern Poland. There is not enough solar energy provided by sun to make it affordable ( whole life cycle including utilization costs )

          • Lumisal@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            I live in Finland. Can confirm we have solar energy. It’s extremely useful considering that in the summer we have near 24 hours of sunlight.

            • endofline@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              And in winter reverse. How much do you get from solar during the summer season ( north region or close to polar circle) ?

              • Lumisal@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                By not putting the solar farms in Rovaniemi?

                They’re in Uusimaa region, which still gets some sunlight in winter. Either way, they produce massive amounts of energy in the Summer, and in the winter we use the nuclear reactors more.