Likening people in the U.S. illegally to “human locusts,” Zuchowski wrote on a personal Facebook account and his campaign’s account: “When people ask me… What’s gonna happen if the Flip-Flopping, Laughing Hyena Wins?? I say … write down all the addresses of the people who had her signs in their yards!” That way, Zuchowski continued, when migrants need places to live, “we’ll already have the addresses of their New families … who supported their arrival!”

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Oh SMCF, darling, could you please come up with something more original, and while you’re at it could you make it grammatical, and maybe it could even scan and rhyme? This quotation only sticks in the mind because it’s like the most irritating commercial jingle. Might as well be Only Daisy cottage cheese will do, Satisfying and fresh, so creamy and delish…

      Edit: Some folks on the force are kissin’ Trump’s arse, while he’s smoochin’ Putin’s, with prayers for the shootin’s… Okay that’s terrible but I didn’t feel I should just tell you do do something and not even try myself

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    in my experience police do not like it when you dox them

    it is especially true with secret police and ex police

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    10 days ago

    Fascist piece of shit. Also, I hate this fucking ridiculous argument they take up - that people that support immigration have to put them up in their houses, personally? WTAF?

      • Sculptor9157@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        9 days ago

        No. Voting against abortion means they must now house, feed, and maintain legal responsibility for all children who would have been aborted, through adulthood.

      • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        This would require that the government be able to retrieve your individual voting record, and then stand in the way of your healthcare based on how you vote. Sounds like a neofascist pipedream.

        I, for one, don’t accept your authoritarian proposal.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 days ago

    Anyone else feel like we’ve returned to some era where people in positions of power no longer get punished? What the hap is fuckening?

      • SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        I’d say it’s more that we have a short memory as a society, and that they never really bothered to hide it, we’re just noticing it again.

        • linearchaos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 days ago

          Nah, at most people stepped down on disgrace. I mean what do we have to go on here, Nixon stepping down from threat of impeachment, Clinton taking a b****** in the oval office?

          You have to go all the way down to congressman to find anybody in prison. As you go down through congressman and governors a large number of them have been overturned.

          Look at the amount of s*** that Trump did outright illegal that would have gotten anybody in middle or lower class throw away for decades. And he still walking free. Maybe we’ll get lucky soon I don’t know…

          Maybe we’ll get lucky and change that shortly…

          • SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 days ago

            Wasn’t Nixon so far gone with Alzheimer’s that they wouldn’t have been able to get him certified as of sound mind?

            • linearchaos@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 days ago

              I think you are thinking of Reagan. He went downhill quick. We were all joking around or semi joking that it was Nancy running the White House at that point.

              Nixon was a little paranoid and erratic around the watergate scandal but that’s to be expected in high political office and are about to be handed your ass. He lived on for another 20 years after office giving interviews and writing.

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 days ago

    Laughing Hyena

    Setting aside the racism there, what exactly is the right’s obsession with Kamala’s laugh? I’ve heard “Cackling” as well.

    Should I be inspired to hear that lord and savior Donald Trump never ever laughs - assuming that’s even true?

    • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Laughing Hyena

      That’s racism and misogyny, all bundled up into two words. The cackling thing is what they say when they think a woman isn’t meek enough. They particularly say it about women in positions of power, especially if they have the nerve to look happy.

      • freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        The discomfort towards having women in positions of power goes back to the bronze-age morality of the bible. It’s the same reason the traditional churches don’t allow women to head the church or preach: they believe woman let the devil tempt and deceive them, and then they went and “caused man to sin”. Then Paul came along and made sure women were put in their place in the New Testament.

    • Bremmy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      They believe anything that isn’t “tough” or “manly” is weakness. They’re just pathetic and unbelievably insecure

  • ATDA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 days ago

    Is it illegal to just leave one in his yard that mysteriously replaced itself?

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 days ago

    Ohio revised Code Section 2909.23 - Making terroristic threat

    (A) No person shall threaten to commit or threaten to cause to be committed a specified offense when both of the following apply:

    (1) The person makes the threat with purpose to do any of the following:

    (a) Intimidate or coerce a civilian population;

    (b) Influence the policy of any government by intimidation or coercion;

    © Affect the conduct of any government by the threat or by the specified offense.

    (2) As a result of the threat, the person causes a reasonable expectation or fear of the imminent commission of the specified offense.

    (B) It is not a defense to a charge of a violation of this section that the defendant did not have the intent or capability to commit the threatened specified offense or that the threat was not made to a person who was a subject of the threatened specified offense.

    © Whoever violates this section is guilty of making a terroristic threat, a felony of the third degree. Section 2909.25 of the Revised Code applies regarding an offender who is convicted of or pleads guilty to a violation of this section.

    R.C. §2909.23

    . . . just sayin’.