• Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Does anyone actually think it is? That’s the ideal, it’s supposed to be aspirational.

    • masquenox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s the ideal, it’s supposed to be aspirational.

      It was never an ideal. It was little more than a marketing gimmick.

    • masquenox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The american legal system isn’t about justice

      None of them are. They are all about maintaning the status quo and nothing else.

    • masquenox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s an unreachable ideal to be continuously worked towards.

      No it isn’t. It’s a pretense that the class who controls the violent apparatus of the state is impartial. It’s propaganda and nothing else.

      • blaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It’s an ideal in that people should be working towards taking control of the state apparatus and making it so. The class struggle will always make it impossible to reach, but it can always be pushed to be better.

        • masquenox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s an ideal in that people should be working towards taking control of the state apparatus

          People are ALREADY in control of the state apparatus. What we have is, by now, the very predictable result.

            • masquenox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              There is no such thing as “blind” justice. What they mean with “blind justice” isn’t justice at all, but rather a blind application of and obedience to law - which liberalism have always (and utterly falsely) conflated with “justice.”