Optional@lemmy.world to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 15 days agoEighteenlemmy.worldimagemessage-square156fedilinkarrow-up11.34Karrow-down116
arrow-up11.32Karrow-down1imageEighteenlemmy.worldOptional@lemmy.world to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 15 days agomessage-square156fedilink
minus-squareSarmyth@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up49arrow-down1·15 days agoThey vote on it rather frequently. They do at the moment but it does waffle a bit.
minus-squareNJSpradlin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down4·15 days agoThe last vote had a very huge abstention ‘vote’, which was the only reason the ‘for’ vote out performed the ‘against’.
minus-squareCaptain Aggravated@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·15 days agoIf “no vote” was a candidate I don’t think we would have had a president since Jefferson.
They vote on it rather frequently. They do at the moment but it does waffle a bit.
The last vote had a very huge abstention ‘vote’, which was the only reason the ‘for’ vote out performed the ‘against’.
If “no vote” was a candidate I don’t think we would have had a president since Jefferson.
Now that’s an idea.