Now if only they could more clearly communicate when games are playable offline.

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      7 days ago

      They do this with Early Access and people still lose their shit about empty content and unfinished graphics in a game they paid $10 for.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      75
      ·
      7 days ago

      Gamers don’t care

      If Valve was against this then they would block them from their store. This is avoiding legal consequences

      • DreamButt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        79
        ·
        7 days ago

        “”“gamers”“” aren’t a monolith

        Some people clearly care bc they are currently discussing it

        • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Well to be fair, we’re like 1% of all gamers. Most gamers don’t give a flying fuck and will gladly buy these products anyway. So the companies don’t really have much incentive to give a shit.

          • pressanykeynow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            That’s why it’s a big disturbing banner where most gamers don’t understand the text but know that big disturbing banner is bad. Will it affect the sales? Not at all. But it will raise the problem(mostly Linux anticheat) to the higher standing people in the gaming companies than before because now they require those top level managers to make a decision is it big disturbing banner or Linux anticheat.

            • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              I highly doubt this will do anything at all to sales. But I’m just guessing. Maybe it will. Hopefully! But I still applaud the change by Valve. I think it’s great.

              • pressanykeynow@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                I don’t think the point is to do anything on sales. Valve profit from sales. It’s to raise the problem so now the managers have to decide on a scale how much they abuse the players. Before it wasn’t even a problem, now it’s Valve: “maybe you shouldn’t wink wink”

        • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Another “to be fair” - what do y’all reckon is the proportion of gamers who could define kernel? (not rhetorical)

          Edit: maybe not as good as a question as how many have any opinion on kernel-level anticheat, since you don’t need to be able to define kernel to be against the anti-cheat if you’ve heard it slows down games

        • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          29
          ·
          7 days ago

          “””gamers””” aren’t a monolith

          That’s why some people discussing it aren’t going to do anything to dissuade the practice

          • kopasz7@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            7 days ago

            Games have been buried in negative reviews for less. We can’t tell in advance.

            But implying you know, and can speak for all people who play games is just bafflingly ignorant and conceited.