Jesus died at 33, so that can’t get returned in the query response lol

  • V0lD@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not contradicting anything. I think someone who’s 25 years and 11 months should not be returned from the query. Hence, the strict inequality

    • schmidtster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      But you absolutely are contradicting yourself……

      they are between the ages of 25 and 30 meaning your information would be incorrect or wrong… and it’s not even a debate since they are in fact between he age range.

      It’s like saying 25.2 isn’t part of 25, and that’s not up for debate, and if it is well you’re not here to discuss in good faith now are you?

      • V0lD@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Okay, since you’re starting to throw insults via this angle, let’s try to make my case via a different route

        Do you think the db is storing your age as an int or as a float? We know from the given information that it is stored as a singular number

        So, I’m assuming it’s as an int, which means that until you’re 26, you’re still 25. If you’re 25 and 11 months, that’s still 25 years old, and stored as such. The strict inequality should therefore not put it in the range 25 < X < 30

        • schmidtster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If it’s a singular number and not a rounded number. Which we could also assume here…. The number 25 would always be between 25 and 30, if you’re using rounded numbers, there is a possibility that 25 wouldn’t be between 25 and 30 since you would need to account for 24.5 and greater numbers rounded to it.

          And with age, you never round up. So according to these well established rules over time. What could it be other than included in “between 25-30” unless it’s not age or a rounded number which you don’t do for age?

          • V0lD@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The number 25 would always be between 25 and 30

            Okay, wait, what do you think the word “between” means?

              • V0lD@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t. This is the crux of the argument

                The integer 25 does not lie in the open interval (25,30). And someone with at least 25 years on him but not yet 26 has an integer age of 25.

                Again, we’re no working with the normal Euclidean topology here, but with the Euclidean topology projected on the integers

                • schmidtster@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That’s a whole lot of words for, “I was caught contradicting and lying and now am now talking out of my ass”

                  The crux of the argument was explained using all possible outcomes, and you still can’t comprehend it. It’s not an integer it’s age, if you’ve stored it as an integer, you’ve done fucked up in every way possible.

                  • V0lD@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You accused me of not talking in good faith before, but I’m not the one throwing insults.

                    Since you seem unwilling to discuss this any further, I’ll halt the conversation too