• four_four_three@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s more annoying that a couple of seasons ago, Martinelli had a goal ruled offside against Brighton because the officials weren’t sure where to draw the line accurately. On-field decision was goal, but was chalked off after a review.

    If they couldn’t find conclusive evidence for the offside on this one, why give it?

    • AgileSloth1@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because the benefit of the doubt is supposed to go with the attacker, as in “its a goal unless you can find conclusive/undisputable reasoning not to allow it”.

      I dunno which goal you’re referring to, but if its like you said, it sounds more like they fucked up there than with this decision.