The fit wasn’t good for the two of them. However, Ronaldo bailed him out of a lot of different games in UCL that year and he deserves some credit for that. Ten Hag didn’t want to adapt his tactics to match Ronaldo’s playstyle (Apparently he does that now with his current lineup), and Ronaldo wanted to play. It’s best for both that they moved on. Ronaldo would have been much better suited to play for City that year in the Haaland role
It was Ole that got bailed out by Ronaldo in the UCL, we were already in the Europa league for Ten Hag’s first season (in which, I should add, Ronaldo consistently played like shit)
The fit wasn’t good for the two of them. However, Ronaldo bailed him out of a lot of different games in UCL that year and he deserves some credit for that. Ten Hag didn’t want to adapt his tactics to match Ronaldo’s playstyle (Apparently he does that now with his current lineup), and Ronaldo wanted to play. It’s best for both that they moved on. Ronaldo would have been much better suited to play for City that year in the Haaland role
Why would you adapt tactics for a 37 year old?
It was Ole that got bailed out by Ronaldo in the UCL, we were already in the Europa league for Ten Hag’s first season (in which, I should add, Ronaldo consistently played like shit)