If the linked article has a paywall, you can access this archived version instead: https://archive.ph/zyhax

The court orders show the government telling Google to provide the names, addresses, telephone numbers and user activity for all Google account users who accessed the YouTube videos between January 1 and January 8, 2023. The government also wanted the IP addresses of non-Google account owners who viewed the videos.

“This is the latest chapter in a disturbing trend where we see government agencies increasingly transforming search warrants into digital dragnets. It’s unconstitutional, it’s terrifying and it’s happening every day,” said Albert Fox-Cahn, executive director at the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project. “No one should fear a knock at the door from police simply because of what the YouTube algorithm serves up. I’m horrified that the courts are allowing this.” He said the orders were “just as chilling” as geofence warrants, where Google has been ordered to provide data on all users in the vicinity of a crime.

  • Wes_Dev@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    6 months ago

    When companies tell you they respect your privacy and you should give them your data, you tell them it doesn’t matter. Because policies can change, and at the end of the day, your privacy isn’t always up to an single company.

    Wait. This was last year, so not the capitol riot. What happened in January last year? I’m in a decent mood today. Just going to skip looking deeper into this one. I have Factorio to play!

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 months ago

    Jokes on you I’m already on the DoD blacklist because I played War Thunder and got spammed with 40 year old “classified” NATOPs by the forums.

  • Gabu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Why, would you look at that - apparently surveillance is fine and dandy, as long as it’s the US doing it. Fucking hypocrites.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Someone with enough reading comprehension to take that tone would have understood it was criticism of the federal government’s hypocrisy and that critics complaining is not the same thing as a law or the courts agreeing.

        • pl_woah@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          You did not provide enough context in your original statement to distinguish between sarcasm and sincerity. Any sufficiently good old stupid statement is unrecognizable from parody.

  • mrmanager@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Just another reason to not have a YouTube account. If you use Newpipe, you can subscribe to feeds anyway without any YouTube account.

    • devfuuu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      Until youtube pulls a twitter move where eventually everything will only be available under a login. Wait and see.

    • AtmaJnana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Isnt NewPipe still making calls to YouTube from your IP? I think you’d need to also configure it to use an Invidious or Piped instance.

    • Pantherina@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      And a reason for platforms to implement zero trust models. I mean they need to hand out data to 3rd parties, they dont benefit from that?

      SimpleX for the Win.

  • THCDenton@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 months ago

    Good thing I have history turned off so I can watch “How to make an AK47 from scratch” in peace :D

    • jinwk00@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      They still somehow track your history despite that turned off

      Notably with recommendations

  • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    For anyone wondering what the videos were:

    In a just-unsealed case from Kentucky reviewed by Forbes, undercover cops sought to identify the individual behind the online moniker “elonmuskwhm,” who they suspect of selling bitcoin for cash, potentially running afoul of money laundering laws and rules around unlicensed money transmitting.

    • shortwavesurfer@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      I dont think newpipe would protect from this since it still contacts the yt servers to pull the video. Peertube or a VPN would stop this though.

      • einfach_orangensaft@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        VPNs protect your from geting caught torrenting, but it cant protect you from the US-goverment.

        First of all most of the advertized VPN’s are Honeypots and/or back/bugdoored by the NSA.

        And even if they where not…so much of the internet runs on servers/services/isp’s that are related to american companys that Timing attacks are possibe (for example your ISP logs and shared your encrypted traffic and the NSA then compares Timing patterns of requests with other services).

        • shortwavesurfer@monero.town
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          Right, but if Google is collecting your IP address to give to the government, then using a VPN would put another step in their path, and they would have to go to the VPN provider to try to figure out who it was.As long as that VPN provider is in another country like proton VPN and does not keep logs Then there’s a good chance that they won’t know who it was that requested the YouTube video

            • fishos@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              What if unicorns are real but invisible and we can’t touch them?

              I can make up outlandish “facts” too.

              • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                there’s a teapot that I think you’d be quite fond of, orbiting the earth right behind the moon just where we can’t see it

            • shortwavesurfer@monero.town
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 months ago

              It could be, that’s definitely true. At some point, you either have to trust something or self-host everything, though.

        • fishos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          You have no clue how vpns work and shouldn’t be giving anyone advice on tech. You are full of shit. I’m not even gonna be polite about it because you are spouting nonsense with complete confidence.

      • balancedchaos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I just found out that Lemmy is not allowing (or has rate-limited, or whatever) VPN connections to post or react.

        Not a fan of that at all.

        Edit: it’s my instance being on Cloudflare, not Lemmy as a whole. My mistake.

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    The headline made me think of back when phone networks were just starting to be fast enough to watch YouTube on data, a guy at the job I was working was caught watching videos of young girls in supposedly lacking state of dress splashing in inflatable pools or something along those lines. Dunno what happened to him but everyone thought he was a nice guy the day before and then suddenly everyone was grossed out by his mere existing.

    My immediate concern though is do they account for people who were tricked into watching like with Rick rolling?

    • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      The videos are not very relevant to the topic of privacy and our freedom.

      Today it might be “extreme anarchy: how to make homemade bombs and guns”. On the surface, its a great idea, go stop those people.

      However, next year it could be something rediculous like “how to rip CDs”. Clearly you must be pirating, time to fine you $500 or put you through a more costly legal battle trying to prove grandpa’s 20 years of CDs were all obtained legally. Wow look at all the free money we just made because most will eat the $500 over hiring a lawyer. What else can we “fine” for?

      The idea that the government could use your internet history against you, with no other factors, is as absurd as wire tapping someone and waiting for them to say something they don’t like.

  • CrypticCoffee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Are the problem with the people who watch the video, or the people who create, or host the videos?