• ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I think for many is shock and surprise is that anything even remotely “ml” is even allowed. Like something illegal is being allowed in plain sight.

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Who makes that distinction? Plus, the idea of destroying the state, Capitalism, class divides, and money definitely is legally opposed.

              • force@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                Who makes that distinction?

                … literally anyone who thinks about it? The US Communist Party is one party, there are plenty of other parties that identify as communist. You don’t have to be called “The Communist Party” to be communist.

                Socialist Alternative

                Revolutionary Communist Party

                Workers World Party

                New Afrikan Black Panther Party

                Party for Socialism and Liberation

                Communist parties aren’t popular at all, but they’re far from banned. There are multiple such parties.

                • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Laws are interpreted and wielded by those in power. The Democrats are already called Communists, what happens if a genuine Socialist party takes some amount of power?

                  • force@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    6 months ago

                    That’s literally an argument against anything that exists at all. That’s kind of how laws work, linguistics is complicated so everyone’s interpretation is different, and many people in power intentionally misinterperet laws. But as it stands, communist parties are not banned. What you speak of is a big “what if”, and currently you saying communism as a whole is banned is simply wrong, even as an oversimplification.

                    It is a big stretch to turn “Parties other than the two largest ones in the country have considerable cultural, legal, and logistical obstacles to being able to participate in high-level American politics, and an unenforced law from 70 years ago banned one specific communist party before most of the provisions being repealed by congress and the law being overturned in state courts as unconstitutional” into “Communism is banned in the United States”. There is no legal way to criminally prosecute someone on the basis of them being a communist, or belonging to any specific communist party at all, in the modern day.

                    I’m not trying to be condescending or anything btw.