Yes.

Messi isn’t a striker

Your list proves you’re 16yo.

What are you even talking about. The dude is 24yo.

CR7 only started to change his style near 30yo. Up until then he was sprinitng up and down the field like a wild horse 25 times a game.

Bla bla bla.

You’re a complete noob in football.

Brazilian and Argentinian hate their guts and this sort of issues is pretty much mainstream.

It also takes a special kind of clueless person to act like Argentinians aren’t among the most racist fans on earth.

Expecting this kind of games to be fair play is wasting your time. It will NEVER happen!

Do you understand that? NEVER.

There are BILLIONS of people in this earth that don’t give a dam about modern social justice and that actually use football as a way to dump their frustrations.

This sort of behavior is at the root of football popularity wether we like it or not. And as such, some very specific footballing environment will always be subject to this sort of shit show.

That’s life. The world isn’t an utopia. It’s filled with garbage.

Was a Super Sub in his first 2 seasons.

You need great subs to be a winning team.

Other than that he never had the discipline and mental fortitude to be a starter for a top club.

Notoriously lazy and very conceited after being deemed one of the best on earth at such young age.

His career going from best Young player in the WC and signing of the year for Real Madrid to absolutely irrelevant at an age where he should still be productive says a lot about his personality.

1- No one will ever argue against that. Pepe was a far better central defender and arguably the best of his generation. In fact, he is NOT a violent player as he has a very low red card tally in his career. Yes, he completely lost his mind once. Ad did not score iconic goals or made part of a dominating Spain. But individually, as a central defender, it’s night and day. There’s a reason why Mourinho would play him Defensive mid to chase Messi around,

2- Highly subjetive. No one ass themselves this question,

3- Xavi and Iniesta had different roles. This is why they were ale to play together. Xavi was a pure central mid. Iniesta was more offensive and sometimes even fell to a wing. Obviously Xavi would control the game better. It was his job. But he couldn’t do what Iniesta did up front. There’s no way to argue one above the other,

4- Who on earth would ever say Zidane had a better career with Real than those 2? Zidane was the best player out of the 3 but he obviously wasn’t as successful nor played so many seasons,

5- Comparing Zidane and Ronaldinho is absolute and utter nonsense. They were nothing alike. Zidane was the one who made things simple. Not Ronnie. Ronnie was the exact opposite. I can’t even fathom how you could processo this argument,

6- No. Just no. Gerrard was the star. Again, totally rubbish,

7- Highly debatable. Puyol was a great right back in his day and did great facing the best wingers on earth. 2 different players with different attributes,

8- Agree. Etoo is immensely underrated. He was a magistral striker and did it outside of Barça Golden Age. His Barcelona was great but wasn’t as good as the following era with Messi–Xavi-Iniesta running the show. Suarez was excecional but the MSN trio would have done great if you had him switched with someone else. Now Etoo was an absolute key factor and by far the top scorer in his team,

9- No one cares. Milan deserves everything they got. You can’t be 3 up at half time and let yourself crumble like that. The penalty was close enough to be “acceptable”,

10- Carvalho was for Terry what Pepe was to Ramos. In other words, the best defender of the 2. To me he was top 3 of his generation as a CB. Pure class. It’s sad that he got banned from the Portuguese national team and as such spent much of his prime out of the team while Pepe was there. Pepe-Carvalho at their prime are unmatched in quality since early 00s Italy,

11- Bellingham is doing it X2.

Mbappe won’t play in France with a overpowered PSG in a shit league forever.