• thesporkeffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    114
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Legitimately curious what she is expecting. My kindest interpretation is she thinks students or teens should get work experience. Maybe she thinks people should have to work several jobs if it’s too… Easy?

    Not that students should have to work…

    Customer service jobs are some of the worst outside of Malaysian ship breaker or Siberian lumberjack.

    • Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      90
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      In my experience dealing with these sorts of people trying to to justify this argument, it’s a combination of:

      1. These are not supposed to be permanent jobs for anyone, i.e. only high school and college students should work them.

      2. These are jobs that should be worked by >!non-white!< people who are comfortable with lower standards of living.

      3. You should work a second job to supplement your income if you aren’t earning enough.

      For #1, they believe that because they (or people they know) treated lower paying jobs as a foot in the door/stepping stone at a time in their lives where they had a social safety net looking out for them, then everyone else can do that, too.

      For #2, they believe that there are people who don’t need to live well and are okay with that. Typically this comes down to racial distinctions and the idea that non-whites must love poverty because so many of them live in it.

      For #3, they’ll dig up some anecdote about some random family member in the past who used to work two jobs where they had to walk uphill both ways there and back and that’s what a real work ethic looks like, then go off on a tangent about how people today are just too damn lazy.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 months ago

        For #1 I always ask them when McDonald’s shuts down? When does Dairy Queen open? If these jobs are “teenager jobs” then why do they operate during school hours

        “Oh, well old people take those spots.”

        Ok, wearhouse jobs are also seen as “teenager jobs.” Is Grandpa lifting boxes while Timmy is at school?

        • Seleni@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          I think the real issue is they don’t really think kids should be going to school.

          Also, yeah, I love how they want Grandma out flipping burgers instead of enjoying her retirement. How is that any better?

          Leaving aside the fact that old people live on their own and have to afford their own houses same as younger adults. ‘Oh, but they have social security!’ That’s just having us pay to make up the wage difference, you twats.

    • circuitfarmer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      8 months ago

      The idea that younger people just need “work experience” is a vestige of a bygone world, when just having that little bit of experience would make you qualified for the job – THE job – that you would continue to do forever, because companies paid for loyalty with loyalty. That isn’t how the world works now and every job, entry level, dead end, or otherwise, is the job that you might need to do forever. That’s why a living wage is more important now than perhaps it was in previous years.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’ve been in a psudo-managment position for over 5 years now in manufacturing and I still feel like I have 0 transferrable experience to bring to another job… How these people think making ice cream or serving burgers is supposed to give you valuable experience is beyond me… Unless they strictly mean “learn how to show up to work.”

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      If easy jobs become living wage then victims of abuse can better escape via building an escape and self sustainability purse.

      Being able to escape the household head’s abuse is anathema to the “family values” system conservatives try to appeal to whenever gays are allowed more freedom than being sent to Jesus camp or force married by their parents.

      • Wes_Dev@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        8 months ago

        And I think you hinted at it, but also women in abusive relationships, even if they’re too indoctrinated to realize it. Even without physical violence, being expected to be subservient to your spouse is very common abuse in conservative USA.

    • phx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      I kinda agree in the aspect that a passing fries and a burger out a drive-thru window shouldn’t be the standard of job people expect to live off forever, and that there should be room for starter-jobs.

      But, the costs of living have gone up while the number of viable of decent jobs has gone down. Maybe the issue isn’t that a burger job isn’t meeting the bare minimum but that people expect you to work an office job for barely more than the burger one, while often also asking for some pretty hefty credentials/experience to boot.

      Even in the McJobs, there should be some path for workers to have stepping stones to better positions. And yeah, there should also be no tolerance of assholes. Fuck “the customer is always right” and make it “we strive for customer satisfaction, but if you’re an awesome we have the right to refuse service”

      • ericatty@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        The thing that bothers me about comments like this is that it has the underlying attitude that everyone should eventually “be someone” and “do something with their life”

        There is absolutely nothing wrong with wanting to go to work, work your 8 hours a day, clock out, leave work at work and enjoy or do whatever you want for the rest of your hours that day.

        These McJobs seem to be jobs “people trying to succeed in life” don’t want to do, but are services and products they expect to be able to purchase and enjoy.

        There is nothing wrong, lazy, or ignorant about people whose priorities are not about work and “getting ahead” - Maybe they want to do their hobbies, or hang out with people they like, or sit in their backyard and no nothing. Not everyone wants to, should, or is frankly qualified to meet some arbitrary measure of success

        People doing the McJobs should still be able to eat, live in a safe home, and raise a family and not have to work 2 or more jobs, or be treated like they are worthless. They are stepping up and doing the jobs we all want done in society.

        And yes, someone’s McJob in middle of nowhere, flyover state might be liveable at minimum wage, and that exact same job be 3 or 4 times that in a big city. It doesn’t change the fact that it should pay whatever it costs to be liveable in the place the job is located. If a company can’t afford to pay it’s employees a liveable wage, it can’t afford to do business there. Same as if the business can’t afford the electricity or clean water.

        Did anyone watch Office Space? Sometimes happiness is found leaving the rat race and TPS reports and doing a McJob that directly benefits others and doesn’t follow you home or ask if you have a case of the Mondays.

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Capabilities are a gigantic overlooked issue.

          I am not capable of “good paying jobs.” I’m not intelligent enough. The biggest problem in my entire life has been the fact that my interests are so disjointed from my actual capabilities. I may love going home and watching Anton Petrov discus new findings in particle physics, or astronomy, but there is no universe where I’m actually capable of doing that work.

          To a more down to earth example, computer science jobs are some of the very few remaining “good paying jobs” I’m way too stupid to be able to do that work, I’ve tried to learn.

          For all you highly empathetic people out there: yes, it sucks to suck, but that doesn’t mean I should just starve and live in someone’s basement, paying their mortgage in rent prices for the rest of my life…

          • phx@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            And that was kinda my point. The issue isn’t just that these jobs won’t pay the bills (with a bit to spare) but rather that they won’t pay the bills, there are less generally-available jobs that do, and those often have hefty requirements well beyond what they should.

            People are being pushed down in the job market and the “McJobs” are insufficient for most people to get by. There user you be more positions that did at one point pay better than flipping burgers and they didn’t require you have a Masters’, five years experience, and 50 grand of student debt courses.

            There were also more retail positions for those that wanted something a bit different than serving up food from a drive-through window. They didn’t pay that much more but it was still something, and people became very knowledgeable in those positions. Want to know what tool does job X, what paint to use for job Y, or where to find the latest movie/single/book from some lesser-known artist: there was a staff member that knew that, and they knew the regular customers too! There was a guy whose main job was to put your groceries in a bag and maybe bring it out to the car.

            Now we have adults taking up dual serving jobs and a side hustle in order to make ends meet. That’s not “end at 4pm and chill” that’s “collapse at home and get a minimal amount of sleep before going at it again and again and again”.

            Corporations cut staff, don’t increase pay, and make record profits. I’m not sad that somebody might be working a McJob because they want to want to, I’m sad because they’re probably working several part-time because they HAVE to and still struggling to get by, with little to no down-time and no opportunities for change.

            And when a bunch of people finally say “fuck it” and employers can’t find even enough people to staff their bare-minimum shift schedule, they cry to the government who brings in a million people from other countries to exploit instead of having the corps actually be pressured to make those jobs less shitty.

    • glovecraft@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      She wants underpaid service jobs so the services they provide remain cheap for her personally. And the teens and work experience thing is just a lie they tell everyone, in reality what they see as worthless jobs don’t deserve to live well. Finally they see others gaining position and wealth as a direct threat to their level of privilege.

  • Toneswirly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Unintentionally stumbled on the truth of capitalism; you need an underclass to run the whole engine

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s not needed.

      It’s just needed to provide fantastic profits to the owners.

      You can definitely have capitalism that pays a living wage, it just cuts into billionaires’ profits.

      • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        8 months ago

        Agreed, but keep in mind that within a capitalist system, the owners will always be fighting to take the working classes money with their profits.

        The working class must always be vigilant and read to fight for their wages. There is no rest in a capitalist system.

      • smiling_big_baby_boy@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Hierarchies are a necessary component to keep the Capitalist murder-cult running. You cannot maintain global domination without class-based social hierarchies.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          8 months ago

          Hierarchies are a necessary component to keep the Capitalist murder-cult any human society running. You cannot maintain global domination literally any organization of humans without class-based social hierarchies.

          Ftfy. Abolishing class is a utopian pipe dream. A good society allows for class mobility and tilts the social scales to make life more tolerable for the lower classes.

      • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        Even with a living wage, workers are still the underclass, and owners the overclass. As long as class dynamics exist, and class interests conflict, the class with more power will dominate the system overall in their favor.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          That’s why government should be the most powerful class, which keeps the ownership class in check via strong regulation.

          • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Government isn’t a class, really, unless it owns the Means of Production in some fashion. Government takes on the characteristics of whatever class is in power, as long as there is Capitalism Government will serve the bourgeoisie.

              • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                It’s not pedantry, you have Utopian thinking. You believe the less powerful can wield the state to suppress those with more power, simply because it’s “just” for that to happen. That kind of moralistic utopinaism, ie belief that because things are “right” that they will be, without actually seeking to understand mechanics, is counterintuitive.

                • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  It’s not utopianism, it’s be central premise of democracy, and has been successfully done numerous times. This isn’t some radical new idea. It’s how our existing government is supposed to function.

    • casmael@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      8 months ago

      Feels like skooby-do pulling back the mask of capitalism to reveal that it’s all just medieval peasants and serfs lol

    • JizzmasterD@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I wonder if the capitalist perspective isn’t driven by the perception of ready supply/demand of people that will, at least initially, apply to take shit jobs/compensation.

  • clearleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    8 months ago

    Why don’t people just use twitter instead of looking at twitter screenshots on every other site on the internet? The names are blanked so we don’t even know who these people are supposed to be. There’s no reason at all to darken our day with her obscure ramblings. It only had 2 retweets and 17 likes when somebody seeked this out to put in other people’s faces. There’s no point to this at all.

    • Skates@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      See, the beauty of a screenshot like this is - it captures a great moment in time. It’s the moment someone should realize they are wrong. And that’s a perfect moment. It’s evocative. We’ve all been wrong before, we know what it’s like. We can feel their reaction by how we ourselves reacted in the past. Or how we wished we had.

      Now, this moment could have several different outcomes: that person could admit they’re wrong and learn from it, they could panic and backtrack, they could delete their tweet or account out of shame, they could double down and be even more wrong and increase the lulz, they could come back with valid arguments and change your opinion etc. But. Depending on what your position is to the initial argument, you may not be satisfied with the outcome. You may find it annoying or roll your eyes. Of course it’s possible that you find it even better than the initial moment, but that’s not a guarantee.

      So this screenshot is a tease in a way, but in other ways it’s also a complete package. It won’t have a disappointing ending. It won’t promise more of itself and then fail to deliver. You can see the screenshot, imagine the outcome you want, and scroll to the next one.

      This screenshot is… enough.

      Also, I’ll be fucked before I use anything musk has been associated with, I don’t wanna support that asshole.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        I was going to say. Twitter five years ago was annoying enough, with its mandatory sign-ons and obnoxious tagging and tracking of accounts. Now the site is functionally unusable. If we’re not getting a screenshot, I don’t know how else we view the post.

    • accideath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      8 months ago

      Simple: ex-Twitter has an abominable app full of ads and tracking, that isn’t useable without account. And if you actually log in, it’s full of right wing shit and musk (which one could argue, is also right wing shit).

      I have no intention wasting my time by searching for the gold nuggets in that giant pile of shit. I was on Twitter when it still was Twitter (until they killed third party apps) and even then, you saw the best tweets as screenshots on reddit.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    What an absolute shithead opinion. Fuck you, lady. Let me get you a spoon so you can eat my ass.

  • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    How does that quote go? Better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool, than open your mouth and be confirmed one. Something like that. Anyway, it applies here.

      • 🔍🦘🛎@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        Well, and for the really uninitiated, this is youtuber H. Bomberguy. He’s known for making extremely long and high quality video essays, mostly about video games, shows, and politics. And when I say politics, I mean he generally tackles right-wing hot button issues like vaccines and climate change.

        This clip is from his climate change video.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      8 months ago

      Christ, barely even slaves. Just purely disposable temporary humans. Locked into a Dairy Queen to work until you die, then flushed out and replaced with someone new.

      At least now we know why these people want to outlaw abortion. Gotta do something about all that human turnover.

    • Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I read it as Dairy Queen shouldn’t exist because it depends on unhealthy labor. You could interpret the whole thing as anti work.

      Many comments here seem to assume the opposite though. I don’t know who that person is.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Making ice cream cones at Dairy Queen should be enough to live on. It shouldn’t be able to buy you a super yacht. Then again, I don’t believe anything should be able to get you a super yacht. Just get a regular yacht and be happy.

    • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 months ago

      This is the fundamental messsage I think. She thinks that she is inherently better than “those who have to work at dairy queen”, and is making up her view of what a functioning society is without thinking any further or actually having to design a society.

    • owen@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      But I need a yacht larger than the one I bought 2 years ago or I’ll never be happy!

  • vamputer@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Hmm, I wonder how many people that believe this would also happen to be the people who raise hell when nobody gives enough of a shit to make their burger right…

      • morrowind@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Wouldn’t self checkout be the opposite? If companies had to pay a living wage, they’d be even more eager to replace the humans with machines

          • morrowind@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            yeah I’m saying paying more would exacerbate that.

            Also tbh, when you account for the extra theft those machines allow, they’re not much cheaper than minimum wage workers, otherwise there would def be a lot more of them, including outside of big stores.

            • force@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              8 months ago

              How do self-checkout machines allow for extra theft? Sounds more like a problem of cheaping out on employees to watch the check-out area if you ask me. You can hire one employee to watch over multiple self-checkouts the entire time, and end up paying less, many stores do that and it works.

              I’m in a relatively rural area and pretty much every general store here has a lot of self-checkouts, and they’re usually busier than the human checkouts (because it’s way faster and more convenient).

              Even without having people at self-checkouts, and assuming that allows people to steal more, theft is pretty much negligible compared to profits from additionally having the self-checkouts in the first place. Many people find it less of a hassle to go grocery shopping if it means they don’t have to have a cashier check them out, and the throughput is higher.

              A lot of times big box stores close down and blame it on theft, but in reality it’s never theft, usually it’s because the workers were about to unionize, or because upper management needed a scapegoat for below expected profits from the store.

              • Emerald@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                If you don’t pay the people watching over the self checkouts a living wage, then why would they care to stop theives? I sure wouldn’t protect the corporation who is exploiting me

            • Emerald@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              The self-checkout should make life better because less workers are needed to perform the same work. However under capitalism everyone needs a job to survive. Additionally, the theft issue wouldn’t be an issue if people were able to just grab what they need and leave the store, no paying a corporation before you go. But a non-capitalist society feels like a pipe dream.

  • solarvector@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 months ago

    I think what she’s trying to say is that we need a UBI that covers living expenses, and providing the essential service of making Oreo blizzards is on top of that.

    • Wes_Dev@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’d honestly be okay with that.

      If every person over about 16 was guaranteed the option of a bare minimum personal living space, a usable Internet connection, plumbing, clean water, and basic nutrition; then I don’t care if there are jobs that pay $3 and hour.

      If we eliminate forced homelessness, give victims of abuse a safe escape, allow people with both recognized and unrecognized disabilities a guaranteed foundation to live on, and generally just take care of the people we extract taxes from to fund our society; then a lot of my concerns about labor and wages evaporate.

      Of course, what we don’t want to to “accidentally” create a de-facto neo-slavery caste who are stuck with the bare minimum and unable to get better work.

      Hell, if someone wants to lay around all day and do nothing but watch TV, I’m okay with that.

      If they want to spend that free time pursuing education for a better life, that’s great too!

      I don’t care, as long as we can get rid of the shitty system we have now in the US. Too many people fall through the cracks and never make it back.

  • Hildegarde@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 months ago

    I agree, corporate executives SHOULD be on food stamps. They should earn well below minimum wage.

    If you’re not passionate about upper level management get the fuck out.

  • penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    America is just a big giant corporation, and a lot of citizens are those useless and heartless fucking bosses who would let you go no matter what happens to you after, just go die on the streets. They don’t care, you’re gone. I hate this shit

      • Malfeasant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        That’s funny… I was once not fired because I missed an email. The email was to meet with my boss, and as I later found out, his plan was to fire me. By missing the email, that bought some time, and brought it to the attention of my boss’s boss, who pointed out that I was highly valued, hadn’t done anything to warrant being fired, and that my boss was just being a dick, though of course not in those words… Also HR chimed in basically saying he’d have to do more to prove his case. I ended up quitting not long after, but it seemed a small win.